Ron is a student of African American history. His writing highlights the stories of people who overcame prejudice to achieve great things.
After President Barack Obama convincingly won reelection in 2012, the Republican Party did a lot of soul searching. It was very clear that demographic trends among the American electorate were putting the future of the party at risk. As South Carolina GOP Senator Lindsey Graham famously told the Washington Post, "We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."
For the past half century, the base of the Republican Party has been overwhelmingly white. In the 2012 election the GOP candidate, Mitt Romney, won 59% of the white vote to just 39% for his Democratic opponent, Barack Obama. However, the incumbent president won the election by amassing 93% of the African American vote, as well as 71% of the Latino vote and 73% of the Asian vote.
In the aftermath of that devastating defeat (President Obama won 332 electoral votes to just 206 for Romney), the Republicans conducted an “autopsy” to determine the causes of their loss, and to give recommendations for rectifying those problems going forward.
The autopsy report, entitled “Growth & Opportunity Project,” noted that the percentage of whites in the electorate is shrinking year by year. The report concluded that if the GOP hopes to win presidential elections in the future, it must find ways of attracting more minority voters.
The Republican Party must be committed to building a lasting relationship within the African American community year-round, based on mutual respect and with a spirit of caring.
— 2013 GOP “autopsy” report
Fast forward to 2016. A few weeks before the November election, the Republican nominee, Donald Trump, was at times polling at between 0% and 1% among African Americans. Clearly, in the several years since receiving the hopeful recommendations of their autopsy report, the GOP actually made negative progress toward their goal of increasing their appeal to minority voters.
Yet it shouldn’t be that way.
Almost a Third of African Americans Self-Identify as Conservatives
According to a 2009 Pew poll, 32% of African Americans describe themselves as being conservative. That is only slightly less than the 37% of the general population who make the same declaration. Moreover, when it comes to hot-button moral issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage, the poll found that the views of African Americans are more conservative than those of the population as a whole.
Yet, while white conservatives identify strongly with the Republican Party, very few African Americans do. Why is there such an aversion, even antipathy, among the vast majority of African Americans toward the GOP?
The GOP and the Taint of Racism
Let’s be frank: many African Americans are convinced that the Republican Party is racist to its core. GOP leaders, of course, vigorously deny that charge. But the historical roots of that perception are well documented.
For decades after Emancipation, African Americans voted (when they were allowed to vote) almost exclusively for Republicans. After all, Abraham Lincoln, the first Republican president, had been instrumental in ending slavery. And in the years immediately following his death, the Republican Party worked hard to secure civil and voting rights for blacks.
The Democrats, on the other hand, were the party of racial bigotry and white supremacy. Before and even during the Civil War the Democratic Party supported slavery. After the war, they worked to legalize and institutionalize racial discrimination and segregation throughout the nation. Understandably, “black Democrat” was a contradiction in terms.
But the GOP’s response to the Civil Rights revolution of the mid-20th century turned African Americans' allegiance on its head. Because of GOP policies and actions that were initiated during that period, and which continue today, many African Americans came to the conclusion that the Republican Party was not one in which they could feel welcomed and valued.
The Presidential Election of 1964 Drove Millions of African Americans from the GOP
The event that caused the most precipitous drop in black allegiance to the Republican Party was the presidential election of 1964. The GOP candidate that year was Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona.
Goldwater was far from racist himself. He was a founding member of the Arizona NAACP, and had helped to integrate the Arizona National Guard. He declared himself to be “unalterably opposed to discrimination or segregation on the basis of race, color, or creed.” But, due to his conservative, states rights principles, he felt compelled to vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, considering it to represent a dangerous intrusion into state affairs by the federal government.
Once enacted, the 1964 Civil Rights Act (along with the Voting Rights Act of 1965) completely transformed race relations in the United States. African Americans, both then and now, consider it to be one of the most consequential pieces of legislation in American history. The GOP presidential candidate’s conservative opposition to this seminal measure caused African Americans to leave the Republican Party in droves.
The Republicans Become an Almost All-White Party
Even Richard Nixon recognized and lamented the direction in which Goldwater was taking the GOP. "If Goldwater wins his fight," Nixon told Ebony magazine in 1962, "our party would eventually become the first major all-white political party.” Although he himself would eventually move in the same direction, Nixon’s comment was prescient. More than a half century later, the GOP remains an almost exclusively white party.
If Goldwater wins his fight, our party would eventually become the first major all-white political party.
— Richard Nixon in 1962
The GOP Initiates a Southern Strategy
Although some Republican politicians and operatives may not have been personally racist, they were quite willing to pander to racists for political advantage.
Recognizing that Southern Democrats were very unhappy with their party’s growing support of civil rights for African Americans, GOP leaders made a deliberate decision to go after those votes. Goldwater himself said, “We’re not going to get the Negro vote as a bloc in 1964 and 1968, so we ought to go hunting where the ducks are.”
In a 1981 interview, high level GOP operative Lee Atwater, a major architect of the Southern Strategy, explained how it worked:
"You start out in 1954 by saying, 'N*****, n*****, n*****.' By 1968 you can’t say 'n*****' — that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites."
After attending a meeting of the Republican National Committee in the summer of 1963, conservative journalist Robert Novak reported on the thinking of many party leaders:
A good many, perhaps a majority of the party’s leadership, envision substantial political gold to be mined in the racial crisis by becoming in fact, though not in name, the White Man’s Party.
— Conservative journalist Robert Novak in 1963
The Southern Strategy was quite successful in encouraging whites who harbored racial resentments to leave the Democratic Party and join the GOP. When he signed the 1964 Civil Rights bill into law, President Lyndon Johnson commented that his doing so would cause the Democrats to lose the South for a generation. He was wrong. It’s been far longer than a single generation, and the South remains overwhelmingly Republican to this day.
VIDEO: Lee Atwater Southern Strategy Interview
The Southern Strategy Continues
As most African Americans see it, the Republican Party has never given up on its Southern Strategy, and continues to follow it today. The necessity of placating the constituency brought into the party by that strategy has, in the view of millions of African Americans, turned the GOP into an institution that is very tolerant of veiled racism in its ranks.
Think, for example, of the kind of language African Americans have heard from Republican politicians over the last several decades.
In 1976 Ronald Reagan energized his campaign for president by bringing the term “welfare queen” into the popular consciousness. Since many whites associated welfare with poor black people, Reagan’s use of that term came across to African Americans, then and now, as a dogwhistle appeal to whites who were beset by racial resentments.
In 1988 a political action committee supporting George H. W. Bush, whose campaign manager was the aforementioned Lee Atwater of “N*****, n*****, n*****” fame, ran ads that accused Bush’s opponent, Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis, of having released on furlough a felon who went on to reoffend. That felon’s name was Willie Horton, and his mug shot photo was prominently featured in the ad. No one missed the fact that Willie Horton was black.
With the 2008 election, and the 2012 reelection of Barack Obama as the country’s first president of African American heritage, the use by Republican candidates and their surrogates of language that came across to African Americans as extremely demeaning and disrespectful accelerated.
For example, former Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich became a rich source of quotes that played well to the Republican base, but which deeply offended African Americans:
- “[Obama] is the best food stamp president in history.”
- "This is a person who is fundamentally out of touch with how the world works, who happened to have played a wonderful con, as a result of which he is now president."
- “And so I'm prepared, if the NAACP invites me, I'll go to their convention and talk about why the African-American community should demand paychecks and not be satisfied with food stamps.”
Former New Hampshire governor John Sununu, a surrogate for 2012 GOP nominee Milt Romney, expressed his sentiments about the first African American president in the following language: “I wish this president would learn how to be an American.” And when Obama appeared ill prepared in his first debate with Romney, Sununu knew exactly where the president’s problem lay: “When you’re not that bright you can’t get better prepared.”
The culmination of what most African Americans perceive as a torrent of disrespect aimed at their race by Republicans is embodied in Donald Trump. Trump rose to political prominence by demanding that President Obama produce his birth certificate to prove that he is an American. Then, as the 2016 GOP presidential candidate, Trump began speaking to almost exclusively white audiences about his conception of the problems faced by African Americans, using language many blacks perceived as highly patronizing.
For most African Americans, episodes like these (and many more that could be cited) are evidence that the Southern Strategy remains alive and well in the Republican Party.
Even Some Black Republicans are Concerned about Racism in Their Party
One high profile black Republican was particularly blunt in calling out his party for their attitudes toward racial minorities. In an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press, former Secretary of State Colin Powell said:
"There's also a dark vein of intolerance in some parts of the party. What do I mean by that? What I mean by that is they still sort of look down on minorities."
— Former Secretary of State Colin Powell
Rather than listening to and learning from Powell’s critique, most Republicans responded with outrage.
“I think the case that he makes is weak, and it is an odd thing for a man who declares himself to be a Republican—and has done so well under Republican presidents—to say,” intoned conservative commentator Britt Hume on Fox News. Another Fox News show featured a panel discussing the issue against a backdrop proclaiming that Colin Powell was “unhinged.”
In no case did any Republicans of note ask to sit down with Colin Powell to gain some insight into how African Americans view their party. J. C. Watts, an African American who is a former GOP Congressman from Oklahoma, and a former chairman of the Republican Conference, stated that his party was “in denial” about how it is perceived by minority voters.
Perceptions of GOP Voter Suppression Increase African American Distrust of the Party
Speaking to the 2013 state convention of the North Carolina Republican Party, Watts noted that although many blacks are no longer enamored with the Democratic Party, they still are not becoming Republicans. “They just don’t trust us,” he said.
A major factor in that growing distrust is the efforts of various Republican governors and state legislatures to enact voter ID laws and other measures that African American perceive as being aimed directly at suppressing the black vote. Well aware that none of the states that have enacted ID laws can point to any substantial amount of voter fraud that would be corrected by such legislation, African Americans are almost unanimous in their belief that the only purpose for these measures is to make it harder for blacks to vote.
And the courts are beginning to agree. In its 2016 ruling striking down North Carolina’s voter ID law, a federal appeals court took the GOP-dominated legislature to task for enacting a law that was intentionally designed to discourage blacks from voting:
"The evidence in this case establishes that, at least in part, race motivated the North Carolina legislature. . . Although the new provisions target African Americans with almost surgical precision, they constitute inapt remedies for the problems assertedly justifying them and, in fact, impose cures for problems that did not exist." (Emphasis added)
Can the Republican Party Ever Attract Significant Numbers of African Americans?
Unless it changes significantly, the Republican Party as it exists today will never be able to provide a welcoming political home for African Americans. Even among black conservatives whose outlook should make them a natural fit for the GOP, the level of distrust is simply too great.
A Black man voting for the Republicans makes about as much sense as a chicken voting for Col. Sanders.
— J.C. "Buddy" Watts Sr., father of former Republican congressman J.C. Watts
Attracting black people would require that GOP leaders – elected officials and candidates – significantly change their messaging to the base they have courted and depended upon since the start of the Southern Strategy a half century ago. As long as African Americans perceive that many statements and policies put forward by GOP leaders carry a hidden meaning intended to appease people who are resentful of minorities, most blacks will continue to view the Republican Party as more enemy than friend.
What’s required is the kind of courageous statesmanship that is willing speak the truth to constituents, rather than pandering to their prejudices. But true statesmen are always rare in any political party. Most politicians, both Democrats and Republicans, have their eyes fixed no further ahead than the next election. But for the Republican Party, politics as usual will never draw African Americans into the fold.
And that’s a shame. Republicans are fond of pointing out that the overwhelming affinity of black voters for the Democratic Party allows the Democrats to take them for granted. That’s one GOP message many African Americans would agree with.
We Need to Have More African Americans in the Republican Party
This country needs for many more African Americans to find a political home in the GOP, so that there can be real competition between the parties for black votes. I sincerely hope Republicans can find a way to start putting forward policy positions and campaign messaging that genuinely invite African Americans into the party rather than driving them away.
Given the party's history, it won’t be easy.
This content reflects the personal opinions of the author. It is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and should not be substituted for impartial fact or advice in legal, political, or personal matters.
© 2016 Ronald E Franklin
Cynic on May 05, 2020:
Minorities in ever country are marginalized from birth. You either accept underachievement or turn to crime. Miserable business.
Claudette on April 14, 2020:
What a history lesson! Excellent. Also, really appreciated your even-handedness, which I'm sure kept many people reading. Well done and congrats.
Garrick on March 22, 2020:
This is the most cogent article I have read on the subject. Excellent work. And the opposing responses to it illustrate a woefully misunderstanding of the subject, as they opine on the conditions and symptoms of a disease rather than the cause.
Take the Native Americans, before the European invasion, they did not live on reservations, experience relative poverty, alcoholism, and unemployment. Following the logic of some responders, this is their fault and they should pull themselves up by their own moccasin straps. And if a some of them, say athletic individuals, celebrities, and a millionaire or two, succeed economically, they should be held up as representatives, as if to say, "See what hard work and self help can do." It should be clear that the Native American community current condition was caused by the Federal and State governments. This is also true for Blacks. Note: These are the only two groups that the federal government, by law, oppressed since the country began.
On role model, unless there is a law that prevents it, certain individuals, in any minority group, will have some skill or talent that is marketable and can be exploited by capitalist. They should not; however, be heralded as proof that all members of that group can succeed likewise, and therefore, deny any economic and social impediments that the group faces in their daily lives.
Finally, on the matter of Blacks voting for democrats in cities where crime and poverty continues under such governments. If you think it is due to the local government, then you must also blame West Virginia and McCreary County, Kentucky. Both are over ninety percent white. Yet, they are the fifth poorest state and the poorest county in the state of Kentucky. But no one would say that their economic circumstances were due to the individuals who live there, pointing out drug abuse, illegitimate babies, family disfunction, or other individual or group pathologies. No, because they are white and we know it has to do with ecomomics. So, why do we judge minorities differently, and blame the individual rather than macro and micro-economics? Could it be because we were taught that something is inherently wrong with non-whites, some clinically wrong with the group. And minority individuals living in poverty, wherever they are, we look for behaviors to justify why. You need only study our history to understand how we got here. The Republican party, unfortunately, is not an agent for change. And for the Black voter, we have always chosen the party who would do less harm, realizing that neither would do much for us. Any party that championed this cause would not win any, particularly at the state and national level.
Sharon on March 01, 2020:
I very much enjoyed your article. It was non-bias and informative. I am a prior long time Dem that just last election switched due to being very dissatisfied with the way the party was headed. I voted for agenda, not the candidates' personality or I might his add past. In my opinion, he is working for all of us. One could certainly say he is not close to replicating even an average Republican in regards to his ideology.
Pamela Lipscomb from Charlotte, North Carolina on August 13, 2019:
Democrats offer the people nothing but social programs that keep us dependent and abortion that is diminishing out numbers.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on July 14, 2019:
Political parties are not altruistic organizations. They exist to get and keep member politicians in office. It's up to all of us to hold parties accountable to acting in our best interests rather than their own.
Besarien from South Florida on July 14, 2019:
Both parties want our votes. Neither serve our best interests. That isn't just true about black Americans or Latino Americans- that's true about the majority of all Americans.
Duane Townsend from Detroit on January 29, 2018:
Ron, I just found this Hub. Very well done. Damned good work.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on September 04, 2017:
Angel, I think it's very much the same with Latinos. IMO, the approval with which much of the GOP base greeted President Trump's pardon of Joe Arpaio, who was convicted of defying a judge's order to stop racially profiling Latinos, shows that.
Angel Guzman from Joliet, Illinois on September 04, 2017:
It's the same way with Latinos. I tell them all the time it makes no sense to support a party that does not respect or like us. Great article and to those in the non-minority community it's a harsh truth.
Dicesi from New York on March 27, 2017:
I think that is temporary. Trump is turning out to be a major let down. They will need to court minorities if they wish to win future elections. Trump supporters are becoming disillusioned by him and if that happens they will be disengaged during elections.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on March 27, 2017:
And now, with the election of Donald Trump, the GOP appears less interested in attracting minority voters than ever.
Dicesi from New York on March 27, 2017:
I would have to agree here. GOP really hasn't made the effort to court black voters.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on March 12, 2017:
Dont Taze Me Bro, as I said in my previous reply, the precise number of black conservatives is immaterial to the issues the article addresses. Since we don't even agree on what constitutes relevant evidence or facts, I agree with you that further discussion probably wouldn't be profitable. Thanks for sharing.
Banned cause of PISSANTS Promisem and Dean Traylor on March 12, 2017:
Ron are you trying to tell me that 32% of blacks are conservative when 93% of blacks voted in 2012 for the most liberal left wing President in history, and that was after 4 years of his "reign" which demonstrated a radical liberal, left wing agenda? No real conservative, black or white, would ever have voted for that. The only way that would make sense is if the 32% of conservative blacks stayed home and didn't vote. But black voters turned out at higher rate than white voters in 2012 and 2008. The Associated Press is out with a study of the 2012 election concluding that the black voter turnout rate exceeded the white turnout rate for the first time. The actual real evidence is voting, not opinion polls by pollsters with agendas, and voting shows that the vast, vast, vast majority of blacks can't be conservative.
Just look at the statistics - conservatives don't have multiple children out of wedlock or abortions. http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/walter-e-william...
African American women have 30% of all abortions but according to the 2010 census Black females make up less than 14% of the female population of the United States. In 2012 (the year it was obvious the Democrats had become a liberal left wing party even to the extent of taking God out of their platform) 72% of Blacks considered themselves Democrat, 14% independent near Democrats, 9% independent, 3% independent near Republican and only 3% considered themselves Republicans. TYo say 32% of blacks are conservative just doesn't line up with any of the factual statistics (as opposed to opinion polls) we have. http://blackdemographics.com/culture/black-politic...
I've focused on this information Ron to be kind, but if you are game I'd be glad to offer further analysis of the rest of your hub page. See the problem is when you start with such agregious flaws in your argument as that poll and comparison you cited, then omissions like the media role, it is hard to even take the rest of your opinions seriously.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on March 12, 2017:
Thanks, Dont Taze Me Bro, for your comment. Let’s address the points you made:
(1) You think that before using poll numbers, I need to analyze how the poll was conducted. First, the Pew Poll is widely respected and cited. I don’t think conducting an amateur analysis would be provide much further enlightenment. More importantly, the point of the article has nothing to do with precise poll numbers. What if only 20% of African Americans are conservative – or 40% - it would not change the issues the article addresses in the slightest.
(2) You say I make assumptions and comparisons that are arguably wrong, but the only thing you cite is my “failure” to mention the mainstream media’s supposed collusion with the Democratic Party. The subject of the article, and of course the data it cites, has nothing to do with either of those. I took care to provide historical information that is widely known and undisputed as to accuracy. If you think some of my info in historically incorrect, you need to provide specific, verifiable evidence to that effect. This you have not done. Instead you default to saying my information seems straight out of some supposed playbook. That’s what people do when they know the facts are not on their side.
(3) You think my article demonstrates why preachers should stick the word and not preach about politics and political parties. I absolutely agree that preachers should not preach politics from the pulpit, and I never do so. But this article is not a sermon. It’s an attempt to demonstrate factually why the GOP has such difficulty attracting African Americans. If you believe that being a preacher disqualifies a person from participating in the public square, I absolutely and unequivocally disagree. The fact that I happen to be a minister has nothing at all to do with the subject of this article.
If you can put aside your preconceptions about playbooks, and bring some factual evidence to bear on the issues raised in this article, it would be possible to have an enlightening discussion. I’m open to persuasion. But only on the basis of facts.
Banned cause of PISSANTS Promisem and Dean Traylor on March 12, 2017:
Respectfully Ron I have to disagree with much of what you say in this Hub page. In the first place you put too much stock in polls without examining the internals of the polls, how questions were asked. If you did an analysis you would find for example in the poll that finds 32% of African Americans describe themselves as being conservative conservatism is likely not defined for poll participants. Your comparison of that poll being only slightly less than the 37% of the general population who make the same declaration is faulty too. How was conservatism defined in that poll and shouldn't you be comparing the poll of blacks to a poll of non blacks?
You make assumptions and comparisons that are arguably wrong, arguments you obviously have not even considered in making your conclusions.
You never even mention the main stream media which WBA points out. It is in collusion with the Democrat Party and the left and your hub page appears to be taken right from their playbook.
I think this hub page is a demonstration of exactly why preachers should stick to preaching the word from the pulpit and not preach about politics and political parties. We can compare preaching to the word to see that it is true but there is no "bible" of politics to vet your mistaken political beliefs.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on March 11, 2017:
firstname.lastname@example.org, thanks for your comment.
I’m not sure what you mean when you say, “The examples of GOP racism that you referred to sounds like they came right out of the playbook of the Democrat party.” The issue is not whether they come from some playbook (they do not), but whether they are true. I took care to document each instance I spoke of, so there can be no question that these words and actions by Republicans really took place.
Remember, the point of the article is not how others may evaluate the reality of racism (particularly when they have no personal experience of it), but how African Americans, who have to live with it every day of their lives, perceive it.
Do you really think that a political party can make African Americans believe they are being negatively affected by racist attitudes that don’t really exist? Or isn’t it far more likely that the people who are at the receiving end of such subtle racism have first-hand knowledge that others lack about its reality and pernicious effects?
I believe that there are many otherwise good-hearted people whose attitudes about racism are shaped by the fact that much of it is invisible to them. Because they don’t see or feel it themselves, it’s easy to suppose it doesn’t really exist, and that claims that it does are just political propaganda. But that’s like saying that because a smoker’s head feels fine, your claim that breathing his smoke is giving you a headache isn’t real, and is just the result of you seeing an anti-smoking commercial on TV.
My hope is that conservatives and Republicans of good will, who would be appalled by overt, in-your-face racial discrimination if they saw it, will step back from their own perceptions and actually listen to what African Americans have to say about the reality and the impact of subtly racist and prejudiced attitudes on their lives.
email@example.com from upstate, NY on March 11, 2017:
Of course racism exists but I believe that the perception of racism is much bigger issue and those perceptions have been peddled for political gain by liberal Democrats and their willing accomplices in the media for a long time.
The examples the GOP racism that you referred to sounds like they came right out of the playbook of the Democrat party. The amount of truth I've observe coming from them is very, very little.
The liberal left has dominated the Democrat party since the early 1970's. Being that the most important division between the liberals and conservatives is Christianity or at least a Christian worldview, it's puzzling that you seem so willing to believe what liberal Democrats have accused conservative Republicans of.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on February 23, 2017:
claptona, my take is that people are people, whether Democrat or Republican, white or black, red or yellow. Most who make it to positiions of power will act first to secure their own interests and those of their tribe. That's human nature, and that's why the Founding Fathers set up a system of checks and balances that works by establishing multiple power centers that help to check the excesses of the others. That's part of the role political parties play - each functions as a check on the natural impulse of the others to accumulate power for selfish ends.
The context of this article is the fact that African Americans, as a minority group, don't have enough political heft to establish their own independent power center - there can be no effective African American political party. Therefore, they must find ways of combating the tendency of the majority toward a self-centered outlook and policies from within the existing parties. That's why blacks need to have a presence in both main parties, so that their support becomes vital to that party's chances for success. As long as Republicans feel they don't need blacks to win and govern, they will continue to disrespect and marginalize African Americans to please that portion of their base that heartily approves of such attitudes. That's why it's important to demonstrate to Republicans that they have a lot to lose by their continuing tacit support of attitudes and actions that communicate the deepest levels of disrespect and disdain for their black fellow citizens.
John D Wilson from Earth on December 03, 2016:
Ron, would could get real nit picky and have a long discussion, which might, or not, be fun.
But, here's the way I'm viewing this conversation - two men talking about politics.
What I found extremely interesting in this election were the following 2 points which both parties partook in.
1) The Democrats weren't really interested in what their "members" wanted, that why the DNC, which is supposed to be a non-partisan board, tried to smear Bernie Sanders for the benefit of hllary killary. You also had the sitting chairperson cheat during the CNN debates, by giving hillary killary the questions that were to be asked before the debate so she had a big advantage over Trump.
Again, this was not for the benefit of "fair play", but another under handed tactic by the DNC and it's leaders.
2) Similar to the Democrats, the leaders of the GOP really didn't care what their members wanted, either. Just look at the 'elites" in the GOP that didn't support Trump, even though the members of their party chose him as their candidate of choice
This told me:
1) Those in charge of directing either party had no interest in what their members wanted
2) That they would use any means needed to direct both parties in the direction the "elites" wanted the party go
So, whether the GOP changes it's message or not, it makes no difference. Even with a "voice" in the GOP, the "elite" would ignore their members whether they were black, white, pink, green or any other color.
The same holds true for the Democrats. They're not interested in what their members want, just their chosen path to more dictatorial rule. (And the GOP is as dictatorial as the Democrats)
So, if you want things to change - it start with you. I personally have given up. I don't think there's a chance in my lifetime of things changing - where the government actually listens to the people.
But, if you want to try and change your community, 2 fellows I highly recommend to read are Seth Godin and Chris Guillebeau. Both describe how to build an organization of like minded individuals.
If you want more government and more socialistic laws like the Democrats and GOP want, I hope you fail.
If you want more freedom for people, less government and the right for you and others to pursue their own happiness - I wish you success.
But, if you think the government is the solution to the problems, you're looking in the wrong place. It start in your community, We are the ones who are supposed to "lead" our parties. We are not supposed to follow the "elite" that manage the parties.
Best of luck, Ron, if you're looking to bring back freedom to the people.
Worst of luck to you if you want socialism in this country.
Have a great weekend.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on December 02, 2016:
Jack, if I’m understanding you correctly, you think that anytime a group votes overwhelmingly against (or for) a particular political party, that’s an irrational act. Here’s a paragraph from a recent NY Times article about the 2012 presidential election:
“From the high plains of West Texas to the Atlantic Coast of Georgia, white voters opposed Mr. Obama’s re-election in overwhelming numbers. In many counties 90 percent of white voters chose Mitt Romney, nearly the reversal of the margin by which black voters supported Mr. Obama.”
Would you say that both those Southern white voters and black voters were all equally irrational? Or could it be that each group had strong objections to what the party they voted against represented, and therefore preferred the other?
As this article attempts to make clear, the actions and attitudes shown by Republicans over the last half century have given African Americans every reason to believe that the GOP neither values nor respects them. Think about it: from the end of the Civil War and emancipation, African Americans identified almost unanimously with Republicans. They didn’t just all wake up one morning and say, “from now on, let’s all be Democrats!” No, the massive shift in political allegiance from the Republican to the Democratic party was due to the directions in which the GOP moved. As the article documents, the GOP became a party that not only deliberately made common cause with the most virulently racist refugees from the Democratic party in the South during and after the Civil Rights movement, but which, by its policies and messaging, continues to communicate to African Americans that they are not important, are not respected, and are not wanted.
I don’t think there’s any group of people on earth who will listen to the policy prescriptions of politicians they perceive as denigrating, insulting, and disregarding them. That’s the way the GOP, from Goldwater in 1964 to Trump today, is perceived by most African Americans. And, as the article documents, that perception is not at all irrational. It’s based on solid historical, and contemporary, fact.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on December 02, 2016:
Hi, claptona. Thanks for reading and sharing your point of view. Here are my reactions to what you shared.
First, given that you are, as you say, someone “on the outside looking in,” I suppose it’s natural that your views would reflect common stereotypes more than they do any firsthand or accurate knowledge of African American life. Where, for example, does the idea that African Americans are doing nothing to solve their own problems or to “stand up to the crime and drugs in their own community” come from? Although they rarely make the national news, I can tell you that such efforts are intense and ongoing.
As the pastor of a church in the heart of Pennsylvania’s capital city, I can also tell you that I very rarely see anyone who has a sense of “I’m owed” because of things that happened long ago. In fact, I can’t recall conversing with anyone who talked that way. I do, however, often speak with people who are very disturbed about what is happening right now.
One thing I think the parade of killings of unarmed black men by both civilians and police over the last several years may have done is to disabuse some whites of the idea that racism is dead. As I write this, a South Carolina jury is unable to reach a verdict in the case of a white police officer who shot a black man in the back as that man was running away from him. Can you imagine the uproar if a black officer had been caught on video shooting a fleeing white man in the back? Yet, as most African Americans see it, because this victim was black, a jury with 11 whites on the panel can’t agree that the officer did anything wrong.
How do you think people in your own community would react if your young men were being repeatedly killed and the wider society seemed unwilling to do anything about it? Do you think that eventually some civil unrest might result?
The bottom line on this is, black people are people, just like anyone else. If you subject any group of human beings to continued and unalleviated injustice, eventually there will be a reaction.
Finally, you ask if you are missing the point of this article. I have to say, yes you are. The article is not about any of the issues discussed above. Nor is it about blacks wanting some kind of special treatment from the GOP. It simply says that the reason there are few black Republicans is because that party has done everything it can to push African Americans away. It is a simple fact of human nature that people, black or white, don’t gravitate toward institutions that dishonor, disrespect, and abuse them. If the Republicans really want to be a party for all Americans, they need to change.
Jackclee lm on November 29, 2016:
Don't you think there is something odd about a group of people voting for one party by over 90%? The only other countries thst happens is in communist countries like Russia and North Korea...or dictatorship like Cuba and Venezuela. It seems the problem is not with the party but the voters. They need to hold their elected official accountsble to their will or else do something else. I never understood why people of Chicago keep electing democrats when the city is in such dire straights especially in the poorer neighborhoods. Why don't they give the other party a chance?
John D Wilson from Earth on November 29, 2016:
It's always fascinated me the "color" difference in America.
I've never understood it, and don't think in my lifetime that I will.
As a white guy looking in, some things strike me as odd.
It seems the hatred that's shown, or frustration, when injustice finally gets the best of people, results in looting and burning. Never is it a focused spearhead to solve the problems of people of "color".
How can the people of "color" stand up to police in a volatile situation, but not stand up to the crime and drugs in their ow community?
I'm not a new kid on the block - I watched the Detroit riots from the roof top, a safe distance into the suburbs of the white population, wondering why they were burning their own neighborhoods and destroying the very businesses that served them. It didn't make any sense to me then, nor does it make any sense to me now.
I enjoy Shark Tank, and who's Daymond John, a smart entrepreneur that seems to have a great head on his shoulder. Michale Jordan, another person of color that seems to be smarter than the average person. Even Moe of Moe's Bows fame, and young black kid who's style for bow ties have mane him a bit famous. Magic Johnson, another guy who seems to be doing the right "stuff". Ben Carson, a smart fellow.
But, these types or kind of people are not, as it appears to this white guy, lauded within the black community - hard working, stick with it until you get it - type of guys. I've never understood why that type of person is not uplifted within the black community.
Particularly with the advent of the internet and much more freedom to make choices, none seem to garner the attention of a "big block" if you will, to make a change within the community of black people. The black community, over all, is still stuck in this "rut" of poverty, a mentality of "I'm owed" because of things that have happened in the past.
And in reality, who much better off is the black community before the large portion of them decided to vote Democrat?
We've all suffered because of poor choices by the U.S. Government, and as it has occurred in the past, blacks have suffered more proportionally that whites or even Latinos.
I don't see a section of the black population doing anything different that what they've donefor the last 40 years - complain about the slavery back in the 1800's. the discrimination of the mid 1900's and talk about how the government should do something.
But, nothing the government will or can do will change much of anything unless the fundamental views of the core black population changes.
As Einstein said, "Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over and expecting different results"
But, maybe I'm wrong here. Maybe I'm missing your point.
Is the attitude of the black population much different than it was when you were a child?
Do you see a movement in the black population that enhances neighborhoods and that lift up people like Daymond John, Michael Jordan and Ben Carson as role models.
Or are these types of fellows who've played and succeeded in the "white" arena, are they dissed as sell outs? Are they considered just Uncle Toms?
I don't think government will ever change the attitude of people, is the point I'm trying to make. Either it comes from within the black community or it doesn't come.
But, again, I'm looking from the outside in.
Am I missing the point of your "GOP drives black voters away"
I myself would like think that a "group that I belong to" is capable of growing and evolving into something more than poor communities and gunslinging neighborhoods.
Is it really the GOP or the government's job to correct that, or does it fall on the shoulders of the people who actually live there?
Again, I'm not knocking. I'm sharing my observations as a white guy looking in.
I'd appreciate your candor and insight.
Cheers on a well written hub.
Marcos Vinicius from Brazil on October 31, 2016:
I don't think so, i'm black and a conservative.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on September 26, 2016:
Thanks, Lawrence. I'm glad the article helped. It's interesting that the Maori have started their own party. I don't think that would work here as our 3rd parties never attract enough support to have any policy impact. And in the racially charged atmosphere we live in today, an African American party would be totally isolated.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on September 26, 2016:
MsDora, I think "programmed to dehumanize blacks" says it very well. Such people have not really examined their beliefs, but the way they see the world is very much colored by a belief system they've imbibed from their cultural environment. They would vehemently deny being prejudiced, but everything they say, and the attitudes toward blacks they portray, say the exact opposite. Thanks for sharing.
Lawrence Hebb on September 25, 2016:
It's always confused me how many of my African American friends have seemed more 'conservative' or right wing yet often voted for the Democrats, yes I know Kennedy was a Democrat and so was Roosevelt (FDR) but this hub went a long way to explaining it.
Here in NZ the local indigenous people (Maori) got so fed up with the way they were treated over some issues and traditional rights they set up their own party!
They work with any group that works for their interests and while it's not perfect it means there's a third voice in the 'corridors of power' but then that will threaten the 'two party system' as there's a 'third force' to contend with that shifts the balance of power!
Thanks for explaining things.
Dora Weithers from The Caribbean on September 03, 2016:
Ron, your analysis is revealing. Blacks are people too, and some respect would go along way in attracting their attention. But do some of the prejudiced white folk even try, or are they simply programmed to dehumanize blacks?
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on August 26, 2016:
Hi, lions44. I have to say that I'm not sure the GOP will take advantage of this opportunity to purge racism from its ranks. Racist votes still count at the ballot box, and for most politicians, whether Democrat, Republican, or otherwise, that fact overrides every other consideration. Many thanks for sharing both here and elsewhere.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on August 26, 2016:
Thanks, Eric. I certainly hope that one day categorizing by race will be an idea that never occurs to anyone. But at this point in history, being categorized by race is a reality African Americans have to live with every day.
Ronald E Franklin (author) from Mechanicsburg, PA on August 26, 2016:
Hi, word55. What you say about Ben Carson is interesting. I think the fact that he led in the polls at one point in the primaries indicates that people are looking for spiritually grounded leadership. But even Carson failed to connect with most African Americans. I'm planning another article to examine why that's so often the case.
CJ Kelly from the PNW on August 26, 2016:
Ron, as a 30 year GOPer, I thank you for this excellent hub. Perception is reality. I'm a "Never Trump" guy, but my party will get one thing out of his ridiculous candidacy: a chance to purge its racist elements. They've all come out of the closet. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who worked for Trump during the campaign, has no business working for any national GOP candidate/elected official) again. We need to erase this stain.
It's a shame that it has come to this. All the work that Bush, Romney and McCain did over the years has been undone by this "alt right" nonsense. "Economic freedom bring social justice" should be our message, but instead we get shouts of "lock her up" and "build a wall."
I just had another Trump follower accuse me of labeling him because he seemed angry. Just sad. They have no ideas, just vitriol.
Can't wait for the Trump followers to read this. Thx again, Ron. Keep up the good work.
Eric Dierker from Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. on August 26, 2016:
Very interesting and of course very well written. I still have problems with categorizing by race.
Al Wordlaw from Chicago on August 26, 2016:
Hey Ron, it depends on the more spiritual leader. Ben Carson would have been much better than the choices we have now. He was conservative and Republican. It would have been interesting how he would have dealt with ISIS and other situations. People here in America are confused. Thank you for pointing that out so plainly.