Bust Open the Rigged Primary System at the Democratic Convention

Updated on June 8, 2018
ralphlopez profile image

Ralph Lopez majored in Economics and Political Science at Yale University. He has been published in the Boston Globe and the Baltimore Sun.

Bernie Sanders California rally
Bernie Sanders California rally

There can be a silver lining in anything, and the attempted rigged selection of Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee for president is no exception. The sight of the gloating, warmongering man in a pantsuit celebrating her grip over the corrupt election machinery of the Democratic party was enough to make many people feel physically ill on Wednesday morning, ill enough to galvanize a movement toward truly open and fair elections.

The final verdict awaits in Philadelphia, and is far from assured. Clinton could be indicted at any moment. And the Democratic Convention will provide Sanders supporters and all lovers of democracy the chance to put forth to the world a coordinated message goes to the heart of our corrupt system: the primary process, the incubator for everything that comes after in any election, is rigged, and present law allows it and enables it.

Never before has the ugly process of stealing primaries in the age of Diebold been on such full and open display in America. We now have a clear target to aim at, so that nothing like this political creature can ever happen again. Who lied into the faces of grieving family members after Benghazi, lied about being under sniper fire in Bosnia, and these are just the little things. Hillary's destruction of a 12-year-old rape victim as a public defender in Arkansas, in order to get a client she knew to be guilty off the hook, indicates something truly missing in this candidate's moral compass.

Jeffrey Sachs, the Harvard economist, now a special adviser to the UN, wrote of Clinton's claim that she had helped "negotiate" a Syrian ceasefire:

"This is the kind of compulsive misrepresentation that makes Clinton unfit to be President. Clinton’s role in Syria has been to help instigate and prolong the Syrian bloodbath, not to bring it to a close."

The collective wisdom of Americans in choosing their leaders and their future has been unjustly slandered. It's not that we don't choose the right leaders. It's that we don't get the leaders we really choose. In 2012, a less blatant hijack of the election system was perpetrated against Ron Paul, who, by all indications, including the Sanders-like crowds he drew from left to right, young and old, was robbed of the nomination.

What most people don't know about our primary process is that it is nearly impossible for most average citizens, or their citizen representatives, to ever view or count a single ballot to verify that what our election officials are telling us is true. These are the same officials who suppressed the vote in Arizona, New York, and California, openly committed election fraud in Illinois, and more covertly in many other states.

How blatant is it? In Chicago, a citizens' election watchdog told a hearing of the Chicago Board of Elections that they witnessed the vote totals of hand-counted ballots at an audit being altered to benefit Hillary Clinton. What happened after this explosive testimony? Did it trigger a full audit? Did Obama's Justice Department jump in? No. Nothing happened. Absolutely nothing.

In Chicago, however, citizens were at least allowed to be present at the mandatory audit, which has sounded the alarm that what everyone suspects is probably true. The numbers of the enormous crowds which Bernie Sanders drew at his rallies compared to Clinton's did not lie, and it isn't true that "large crowds don't equal votes," as shills for the establishment candidate are fond of saying to explain the discrepancies between visible support and polled results.

It defies common sense that the candidate who draws 40,000 people to a stadium or Manhattan park can lose to the candidate who does not even fill a high school auditorium. Now we have a good explanation for that. The numbers are rigged from the start.

The good news is, in the past decade, most states have moved to paper ballots or verifiable paper trail voting. The bad news is, with few exceptions, no one except election officials are empowered to examine and recount those paper ballots.

This is where the change must take place. Open, accessible primary audits which can be witnessed by citizens, campaigns, or their representatives, written into law in every state. Down to the level of discerning candidate choice markings on the ballots. In an age when video surveillance has for the most part become an intrusion on privacy and civil liberties, this is one area where video surveillance could become an important part of the solution.

Ballots can be immediately scanned and digitized on CDs for public inspection. Let's turn the cameras and technology back on those who have solidly earned our distrust.

Citizen watchdogs testify to witnessing fraud for Clinton at Chicago vote audit

The fact is, since we are relying on the same officials who dropped hundreds of thousands of likely Sanders voters from the rolls, or changed their registrations, in Arizona and New York, two critical states, to tell us who won, we really don't know what the true count is in those ballot boxes. We are relying on the same people who altered vote totals in Chicago, who allowed unregistered caucus voters to crash the Nevada caucuses in support of Clinton, and who shut down a state convention after ramming Hillary through. The Democratic primary apparatus is rotten to the core.

Mathematician and election expert Richard Charnin has done state-by-state analysis estimating by how much Sanders would likely have won by, had the primaries been honest, given the entire range of voter suppression tactics and other forms of election fraud employed by Clinton-dominated election machineries.

It is not true that brave Americans fought and died for our right to vote. They fought and died for our right to vote, and to have it fairly and meaningfully counted.

As obnoxious as Trump is, he has the charm, unlike Hillary, of blurting out an occasional truth. Trump said that the Democratic primary was "100 percent" rigged for Clinton. For his part, Trump had figured out how to win votes by margins which could not be overcome by Republican establishment cheating, a sad commentary on the dark underside of the American character which embraces xenophobic nationalism and religious bigotry.

Josef Stalin famously said: "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." A full and transparent primary process should be one of the key demands of all Democrats going into the convention. Why would anyone oppose this?

Let's see the ballots in every state where there was a whiff of wrongdoing, and that is many, in open, random audits verifiable by citizens or their representatives. If Hillary wants to enter the convention as the legitimate nominee, then this is what must happen. If not, what are the Clinton establishment forces afraid of?

Questions & Answers


      0 of 8192 characters used
      Post Comment

      No comments yet.


      This website uses cookies

      As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, soapboxie.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

      For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

      Show Details
      HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
      LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
      Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
      AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
      Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
      CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
      Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
      Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
      Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
      Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
      ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
      ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)