Arguments For and Against Bullfighting
Bullfighting is a deeply controversial spectacle that is called a "fine art" by its supporters and a "blood sport" by its critics.
It mainly takes place in European countries such as Spain and Portugal, as well as certain Latin American countries, such as Mexico.
The spectacle takes place inside a bullring, where one or more bulls are baited, before being killed, according to formal rules and customs, which are interpreted by the bullfighter.
As there is no competitive element, bullfighting cannot strictly be called a sport, but it is seen as an art form by its fans.
Bullfighting has been going on for thousands of years, but has increasingly come under critical pressure in recent decades, as the animal rights movement has grown.
Critics of the practice can be found inside bullfighting's heartlands, as well as in the wider world.
Bullfighting Around The World
Spain, Portugal, southern France, Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and the Philippines all have bullfighting as a traditional spectacle.
There are also other places in the world, which have non-lethal versions of bullfighting, and places where bulls fight other bulls, rather than people, such as the Persian Gulf, Bangladesh, Peru, Balkans, Turkey, Japan, and Korea.
The Oldest Bullring
The oldest bullring in the world is the Plaza de Toros de la Real Maestranza de Caballeria in Seville, Spain. Bullfighting takes place there during the annual Seville Fair and is part of the Real Maestranza de Caballeria de Sevilla, a famous guild created for traditional cavalry training.
Construction of the bullring began in 1749 at the place where a previous bullring had been located. Work was supervised in the early stages by Francisco Sanchez de Aragon and Pedro y Vicente de San Martin and the inner facade of the plaza (know as the Palco del Principe or Prince's Box) was finished in 1765.
Sculptures were added by the Portuguese sculptor Cayetano de Acosta.
Bullfighting is the only art in which the artist is in danger of death and in which the degree of brilliance in the performance is left to the fighter's honor.— Ernest Hemingway
Arguments for Bullfighting
- Bullfighting is an art form, and should be seen as an equivalent to dance, or painting, or music.
- It is a traditional in many areas and in places like Spain, it probably goes right back to at least the Roman period. It is living history.
- Bullfighters are skillful and behind all the pomp and ritual, the bull is actually being killed in a very efficient manner.
- Far more bulls are killed to be eaten by abattoirs than die in the bullring. There are many abattoirs who operate in a less than effective manner. The focus on banning bullfighting as being particularly cruel is misplaced.
- In some places, parts of Spain especially, bullfighting is perceived by many people as being an integral part of the regional culture.
- Critics sometimes argue that bullfighting is wrong because it is killing for fun, rather than out of the necessity of killing to eat. This should be seen as more of an argument for full vegetarianism, rather than an anti-bullfighting one, however - as every time someone chooses a steak over a salad, or a beef burger over a cheese sandwich, you could argue that they are endorsing killing for "fun".
Courage and grace is a formidable mixture. The only place to see it is the bullring.— Marlene Dietrich
Bullfighting is Cruel?
Types of Bullfighter
There are three main bullfighting types:
Matador de Toros - Considered to be both athletes and artists by bullfighting fans, his job is to gradually subdue the bull. He is judged by the crowd according to his style and bravery.
Picador - He rides a horse and spears the bull with a special lance called pica. The horse is protected from the bull's horns by a 'peto', a mattress-like shield.
Banderillero - He is a matador who plants banderillas (little flags) into the bull. The crowd judge him
Arguments Against Bullfighting
- The practice is barbaric. Essentially, bullfighting is ritually slaughtering an animal purely for fun.
- It is archaic, rather than "traditional". We no longer allow gladiatorial contests, so why should we allow bullfighting?
- It is not just the bulls who suffer, horses are also injured and suffer death (not to mention the bullfighters themselves, who can be maimed or killed as well).
- The death of the bull is extended and painful, making it unnecessarily cruel. The argument that the bullfighter kills the bull efficiently is clearly questionable, if anything, the customs of the spectacle demand that the animal's death is drawn out, rather than quick.
- People who are for bullfighting play down the amount of bulls killed, but figures gathered by animal rights groups suggest that 2,500 bulls are killed in Portugal each year and in Spain the figure is closer to 30,000.
To protest about bullfighting in Spain, the eating of dogs in South Korea, or the slaughter of baby seals in Canada while continuing to eat eggs from hens who have spent their lives crammed into cages, or veal from calves who have been deprived of their mothers, their proper diet, and the freedom to lie down with their legs extended, is like denouncing apartheid in South Africa while asking your neighbors not to sell their houses to blacks.— Peter Singer, Animal Liberation
Are you for or against bullfighting?
© 2013 Paul Goodman