The Brown Eyes vs. Blue Eyes Experiments
A Little Background
If you are unfamiliar with this social experiment done with a third grade classroom in 1968, this is certainly a story worth looking at. Jane Elliot says, that after the Martin Luther King Jr. assassination, she heard newscasters saying "who will hold your people together" and the question inspired her to begin a new lesson at her school. Her students asked her "why they killed a king" and the Brown Eyes/Blue Eyes became part of a curriculum that was chronicled by a book, A Class Divided and is still taught in various workshops around the world today.
To begin her lesson, she surveyed her class of all white students and asked them what physical characteristic she could use to divide her class into two groups. One of the students said they could use eye color and Elliot decided to split the class into two groups: brown and blue. (I'm not certain about other shades such as green or gray, but I think the brown probably meant light and dark). Initially, the class was excited about this project and seemed to look forward to it. Eventually though, this arbitrary division based on eye color would have a dramatic effect on the way students performed, behaved and felt about themselves.
The blue eyed students, when told they were superior and offered privileges such as extra recess time, changed their behavior dramatically and their attitudes toward the children with brown eyes. The act of treating students differently was obviously a metaphor for the social decisions made on a larger level. Eye color, in actuality is a physical attribute such as the color of one's skin (which was the main objective when the experiment was originally done) and could serve as a symbol for other attributes whether they be physical, social, or any of the other categories that as humans we deal with in a cosmopolitan mixture of others.
What Elliot discovered is that initially the blue eyed folks felt not only alienated, but would begin to taunt the students with brown eyes. The Brown eyes sometimes retaliated, becoming violent, although the one student who hit another "in the gut" realized that his violent act provided little resolution. Performance on tests by the students who were told they were in the superior group excelled while the same tests scores plummeted for the group that represented the oppressed. Enthusiasm increased for those who were from the group on top, while the group who was told they were less than equal became withdrawn and depressed. All this was done in span of less than a day.
Clearly the metaphor for discrimination - whether it be segregation in the South, the rounding up of "unacceptables" in Nazi Germany, or the way some groups are marginalized today, Elliot's observations seem to reflect what one would expect. There are places today where Elliot - and others like her - conduct workshops similar to the Riceville School exercise, where the message about treating your fellow human beings with respect is often viciously pounded into the attendees heads.
Her overall philosophy of equality and fairness are difficult find objectionable and probably if surveyed, most persons would agree that discrimination based on race is wrong. However, some concerns about her methods - whether they could cause psychological harm are worth looking at. In addition, Elliot seems to be particularly interested in the White Male Hierarchy - perhaps Patriarchy - which is not only rather limited, but discriminatory in that it seems to put the burden of racism on white males exclusively.
Racism isn't limited to Caucasians nor "white men" only. The fact that many of her experiments and workshops seem to reflect a philosophy that seems to neglect to acknowledge other sorts of bigotry should be given some attention.
Frontline: A Class Divided
- A Class Divided | FRONTLINE | PBS
One of the most requested programs in FRONTLINE's history - the story of a teacher's daring lesson in discrimination.
Are you familiar with the Brown Eyes vs. Blue Eyes experiement?
Elliot's Premises and Presumptions
Elliot's experiment - which was documented in a 1970 film "Eye of the Storm" - certainly had noble intentions and produced some profound observations. It should be expected that if you are treated as if you are expected to succeed, you shall find it easy to achieve your goals. On the opposite side of that, if you are told that you are a failure and no good, you probably will not only find it difficult to accomplish your requires tasks, but may find the effort futile, given that your successes go unrecognized. This should be pretty straightforward and Elliot's findings, even with her third grade class, reflect those statements very vehemently.
In any society there will be a hierarchy of sorts. There will always be a person or a group that manages to achieve a level of comfort that will be envied. Someone in any given gathering will be better looking, more athletic, smarter, richer or be gifted with an ability that is lacking in another. Social stratification is a theory that proposes in order for a society to properly maintain order, there must be a dominant culture at the top which often displaces the others below it. This type of social theory is generally viewed from an economic perspective, although class can be influenced by other factors such as race, gender, social group and so forth.
Elliot's main premise seems to focus on race and what the white American culture has done to the other minorities, or more accurately, people of color. It is imperative to keep in mind that many of her influences had to do with the prevalent attitudes that were influential in her time, particularly segregation. Elliot was teaching in a small Mid-Western American town which was completely white. In the 1960's, images of African Americans having water hoses turned on them or being mowed down by police dogs were ubiquitous on the television screens and newspapers. Racism, although not new, was certainly a turbulent topic that divided the nation at the time.
Some Images From the Civil Rights Movement (1960s)
A Few Words in Defense of White Culture
When discussing race issues in the United States - perhaps the world - it is inevitable that whites will be attributed with most of the blame. While there are certain elements of "white privilege" that are fairly obvious - from the Constitution to popular culture - it is probably unfair to make the claim that all whites are to be held accountable for philosophies of racination. Certainly it must be acknowledged that discrimination based on skin color knows no adherents: any creed can be have elements of racial superiority and everyone probably has been judged by their physical appearance in one way or another at some time.
Elliot's experiment though was initiated because there seemed to be accepted social attitudes at the time, particularly in the media, that were worthy of examination. When a reporter asked Civil Rights leaders "Who will hold your people together? When Kennedy was shot, his widow helped us..." there are implications of superiority and separation in the interrogation. The media seemed to portray a division between black and white culture specifically and held that whites were superior. When one looks back at footage of the police response to many of the protests, there doesn't seem to be much compassion to the right of a peaceful group to exercise their Constitutional rights.
Dialogues on Race Issues
Do You Identify With a Racial or Ethnic Background?
If so, what do you
Opening a Dialogue
Whether or not you agree with Elliot's methodology, you will probably agree that her actions helped demonstrate a psychological reality and inspire dialogues concerning various social theories. While Elliot certainly is not the first person to speak out about race, the results of the experiments with her classes demonstrated the profound effects the power of suggestion could have. The brown eyes who were told they were inferior demonstrated a decline in academic performance, a propensity towards senseless violence and became withdrawn, all in a period of hours of being told that they were seen by the rest of the class as no good. When examined in a larger social context, and looking at some of the statistics concerning race, it seems apparent the profound affect the idea of racial superiority has had on those groups that have been marginalized by the dominant culture.
Elliot eventually had a documentary film - The Eye of the Storm - made about her work and a book called A Class Divided was authored. She has continued her work with employees of correctional facilities, college students and done tours worldwide, demonstrating her lecture to people from all walks of life. She calls herself "The Bitch" and is adamant and unrelenting about her message and pounds her philosophy into the ears and heads of those willing to listen. Sometimes she is meet with hostility and resentment, which seems an unusual response, especially from audiences who are willing participants. Woman have screamed and yelled at her, men have broken down in tears.
Whether the responses to Elliot's diatribes are the result of accusations of racism (if you are white, you are therefore racist), being marginalized and put down in the group setting, fear and frustrations of the unknown and misunderstood, or just symptomatic of a modern era where everyone seems confused. In our day and age, information travels so quickly and the lessons of history are often a burden that we are reminded of constantly. It is difficult to not turn on a news program, watch a television show, or read a news article where some element or race, or other characteristic, is not given attention. To have an open dialogue in a public forum where this information is discussed in an often volatile manner, will produce dramatic results.
Blue Eyes vs. Brown Eyes
Have you ever felt discriminated against because of your physical appearance?
A Clip From a Modern Workshop by Elliot
Are Elliot's Methods Sound and Fair?
While watching Elliot in some of her interviews or workshop clips, you cannot help but wonder that she must realize that she is an actor and that in order to convey her message, she puts on a charade of sorts. The participants must also realize that when they attend her class, that they are part of the scheduled drama. However, listening to her tone and seeing her physical language and looking at the reactions of the people during her lectures, one can't help but wonder if she is really hurting people's feelings. Does she attain any sadistic pleasure from her vicious pantomimes? Is it possible that there is psychological damage occurring? There must be some sort of trauma involved, even if it is temporary. I personally felt a bit traumatized watching some of the episodes on video; I wasn't even in the same room.
Also one must ask, is it fair to marginalize whites and put the blame for racism and all the world's ism's on one particular group? Especially males? The phrase "white male" was a pretty common verbiage when I was a younger. I remember hearing this phrase, used disparagingly on college campuses and wondering why people felt the need to speak in that way. There were articles in newspapers on the "evil white male oppressive system" in addition to a push for multiculturalism. If judging a man by the color of his skin is so wrong, isn't it wrong to make allegations, accusations and other statements about Caucasians, based on their tone, just as bad?
A Few Things to Think About
Other Perspectives on a Complicated Subject
Certainly we have all experienced some sort of prejudice in one form or another. No one is exempt from discrimination. Some people might have felt exclusions because they are not tall enough. You might be excluded from visiting a night club because your hair isn't blonde enough or your features are not acceptable to others who have decided what is good and what is not so good. You cannot go about in the world making choices and decisions about what to do and who to talk to. Certainly there are going to be people who you may choose not to acknowledge and often it is based on something arbitrary. You may also choose not to talk to someone because they are too young or old. Because it is a woman from a class that you have had uncomfortable experiences with. The possibilities are actually endless.
It is a natural inclination for people to separate themselves into smaller groups when they find themselves in a larger group. Initially, the decisions may be based upon physical characteristics: skin color, age, perceived ethnicity, gender. Eventually other groups might form based on class, social group, religious preference. People might discover things like intellectual ability, interest and eventually there will be cross cultural relationships forming: an older white Catholic white woman might find herself in a nice conversation with a young, Palestinian man who is an adamant atheist.
Racism is not the major or only form of discrimination. It is probably one of the more overt and in reality senseless forms of bigotry. Isn't it considered refined to have "discriminating tastes" however? Isn't that phrase, as boastful as it is, absent of any disparaging connotation? When you are one of the excluded groups though - regardless of the circle - you don't enjoy being marginalized and certainly there are other immeasurable effects that go along with the physical isolation. In the study of her third grade students, many decided to give up and this notion of apathy was adopted within a few hours of being told they were no good. Think about what centuries of the idea of inferiority coupled with the daily onslaught of negative images has done to some.
Much of it could be in perception as well. You take things as you do and create your own reality. If you tell yourself you will succeed you will. If you set yourself up for failure, you have already failed. It's called a self fulfilling prophecy.
Perhaps you have skin that is brown or yellow. Maybe you have a little more weight in your middle section than you want. Maybe you are extremely fit and find yourself the victim of continuous unwanted attention because of your beauty. Maybe you are finding yourself near retirement and confused and alienated by the pace of the modern world. Maybe you are none of those things and just wondering what the fuss is about.
Maybe you worship in a mosque instead of a cathedral or a temple.
Perhaps you are waiting, like many others, for the mother ship to one day return and answer all of your questions and take you home.