Fin lives in the Central Valley, where he is a student at CSUB. He writes in his free time and is interested in social issues and travel.
If you are unfamiliar with this social experiment done with a third grade classroom in 1968, this is certainly a story worth looking at. Jane Elliot said that after the Martin Luther King Jr. assassination she heard newscasters saying: "Who will hold your people together?" The question inspired her to begin a new lesson at her school. Her students asked her: "Why did they kill a king?"
To begin her lesson, she surveyed her class of all white students and asked them what physical characteristics she could use to divide her class into two groups. One of the students said they could use eye color, and Elliot decided to split the class into two groups: brown and blue.
Initially, the class was excited about this project and seemed to look forward to it. Eventually, though, this arbitrary division based on eye color would have a dramatic effect on the way students performed, behaved, and felt about themselves.
How the Division Affected the Children
The blue-eyed students, when told they were superior and offered privileges such as extra recess time, changed their behavior dramatically and their attitudes toward the children with brown eyes. The act of treating students differently was obviously a metaphor for the social decisions made on a larger level.
What Elliot discovered is that, initially, the blue-eyed folks felt not only alienated but would begin to taunt the students with brown eyes. Performance on tests by the students who were told they were in the superior group excelled, while the same test scores plummeted for the group that represented the oppressed. Enthusiasm increased for those who were from the group on top, while the group who was told they were less than equal became withdrawn and depressed. All this was done in a span of less than a day.
Elliot's Premises and Presumptions
Elliot's experiment certainly had noble intentions and produced some profound observations.
It should be expected that if you are treated as if you are expected to succeed, you shall find it easy to achieve your goals. On the opposite side of that, if you are told that you are a failure and no good, you probably will not only find it difficult to accomplish your requires tasks, but may find the effort futile, given that your successes go unrecognized. This is an example of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
- A Class Divided | Frontline | PBS
One of the most requested programs in Frontline's history: the story of a teacher's daring lesson in discrimination.
Opening a Dialogue
Whether or not you agree with Elliot's methodology, you will probably agree that her experiment inspires dialogue.
While Elliot certainly is not the first person to speak out about race, the results demonstrated the profound effects the power of suggestion could have. The brown eyes who were told they were inferior exhibited a decline in academic performance, a propensity towards senseless violence and became withdrawn, all in a period of hours of being told that they were seen by the rest of the class as no good.
Elliot eventually had a documentary film, The Eye of the Storm, made about her work and a book called A Class Divided was authored. She has continued her work with employees of correctional facilities and college students and done tours worldwide, demonstrating her lecture to people from all walks of life.
She calls herself "The Bitch" and is adamant and unrelenting about her message and pounds her philosophy into the ears and heads of those willing to listen.
Are Elliot's Methods Sound and Fair?
While watching Elliot in some of her interviews or workshop clips, you cannot help but wonder that she must realize that she is an actor and that, in order to convey her message, she puts on a charade of sorts. The participants must also realize that when they attend her class, that they are part of the scheduled drama. However, listening to her tone and seeing her physical language and looking at the reactions of the people during her lectures, one can't help but wonder if she is really hurting people's feelings.
Does she attain any sadistic pleasure from her vicious pantomimes? Is it possible that there is psychological damage occurring? There must be some sort of trauma involved, even if it is temporary. I personally felt a bit traumatized watching some of the episodes on video; I wasn't even in the same room.
Other Perspectives on a Complicated Subject
Certainly, we have all experienced some sort of prejudice in one form or another. No one is exempt from discrimination. Some people might have felt exclusions because they are not tall enough. You might be embarrassed to visit a night club because your hair isn't blonde enough or your features are not appealing to others who have decided what is good and what is not. The possibilities are actually endless.
People naturally feel comfortable with people who are "like them." Initially, the distinctions may be based upon physical characteristics: skin color, age, perceived ethnicity, gender. Eventually, other groups might form based on class, social group, or religious preference. People might discover things like intellectual ability and interest and eventually there will be cross cultural relationships forming: an older white Catholic woman might find herself in a nice conversation with a young, Palestinian man who is an adamant atheist.
The Great Power of Suggestion and Perception
Racism is not the major or only form of discrimination. It is probably one of the more overt and, in reality, senseless forms of bigotry. In the study of her third grade students, many decided to give up, and this notion of apathy was adopted within a few hours of being told they were no good. Think about what centuries of the idea of inferiority coupled with the daily onslaught of negative images has done to some.
Much of it could be in perception as well. You take things as you do and create your own reality. If you tell yourself you will succeed, you will. If you set yourself up for failure, you have already failed. It's called a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Perhaps you have skin that is brown or yellow. Maybe you have a little more weight in your middle section than you want. Maybe you are extremely fit and find yourself the victim of continuous unwanted attention because of your beauty. Maybe you are finding yourself near retirement and confused and alienated by the pace of the modern world. Maybe you are none of those things and just wondering what the fuss is about.
Maybe you worship in a mosque instead of a cathedral or a temple.
Perhaps you are waiting, like many others, for the mothership to one day return and answer all of your questions and take you home.
This content is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and is not meant to substitute for formal and individualized advice from a qualified professional.
Questions & Answers
Question: Does this experiment violate any American psychology Association standards or guidelines?
Answer: That is a very good question and one that really cannot be provided a simple yes or no answer. When this was done originally, it was not an official experiment done for research purposes per se. The newer ones most possibly are, but it may not be an experiment in the traditional sense.
Guidelines usually imply informed consent as well as the fact that no harm will be done. It is difficult to say whether or not any psychological harm was committed in the current experiments with adults. I am sure there are instances of trauma because if you see some of her videos you will definitely view examples of turmoil where it appears that someone is being harmed.
Many of the experiments through recent history have violated ethical standards: The Stanford Experiment; many of Skinner's shock experiments and of course things like the Tuskegee airman.
I have an article on some of those too: https://soapboxie.com/government/Some-of-the-Most-...
I cannot give you an honest answer, but you bring up a good point. Most universities have IRB (Institutional Review Boards) that approve experiments now. Please see https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ for the APA Code of Ethics.
© 2017 Fin
Fin (author) from Barstow on July 05, 2017:
thanks Larry....i recommend the videos in the links either way.....she's a little crazy sometimes
Larry Rankin from Oklahoma on July 05, 2017:
Fin (author) from Barstow on July 03, 2017:
i agree galaxy. I tried to be a little flippant at the end when i mentioend the mother ship. I think Elliot gets a little harsh sometimes....but people will judge you based on the way you look as well as other categories...and it is just a fact of life unfortunately.
GalaxyRat on July 03, 2017:
Hi, I hate the fact that people do this. I don't CARE what color your skin or eyes are, you're still human. Sadly, some people do, and they judge wrong because of it. Like the Japanese back in the day being shipped off in the U.S because we thought they had something to do with spying.
I don't CARE because I shouldn't have to. We are the same, and nothing can change that.
We aren't different colors, we are just different shades of grey.
And still, THAT shouldn't even classify who we are.
Tamara Moore on July 02, 2017:
All color eyes are beautiful, but I've always favored dark, soulful eyes.
Fin (author) from Barstow on June 29, 2017:
thank you. I am grateful for hubpages for creating this because it has been so long since I've actually done any academic writing. This is great practice.
when I first was exposed this in college I thought it was impressive now I am not too sure...thank you for your comments.
Lori Colbo from United States on June 29, 2017:
I saw this documentary as a child and I've never forgotten it. It was so powerful. What I remember most were the eyes of the students who were being discriminated against. It broke my heart, made me scared, and I remember understanding the premise, but as a child thought it was too harsh. I'm really glad you wrote about this.