Update: US Government Keeps Us in the DARK about GMOs

Updated on August 3, 2016
Source

It's Gotten DARKer

On July 23, 2015, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, an Orwellian title for a law more accurately renamed by opponents as the Deny Americans the Right to Know Act or the DARK Act.

Recently, the Senate passed a new DARK Act and President Obama signed it into law.

Unfortunately, in some ways S.764, called the Non-Labeling Bill by critics, is even darker than the first. Why? Because it appears to be ensuring transparency in food labeling while actually allowing manufacturers to disclose as little as they like, including nothing at all, about the actual GMO content of their products.

It also allows manufacturers to meet labeling requirements through QR codes inaccessible to those without smartphones or other devices that can read them.

If our government speaks for agribusinesses like Monsanto, who speaks for us?

S.764, the Non-Labeling Law

S.764 blocks state-mandated labeling laws, such as the law recently passed by Vermont.

It also gives manufacturers various methods for labeling products that contain GMOs. They can add

1) labels with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) GMO symbol,

2) a statement in plain language that GMOs are present in the food,

3) a scanner/smartphone readable label that links to ingredient information, or

4) a web address or telephone number that directs consumers to additional product information.

Sounds pretty good, huh? Like it's a win for those of us who believe we have a right to know what's in our food. But wait . . .

The bill does not include penalties for companies that fail to comply, making S.764 not that much different from the voluntary compliance bill Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS) was pushing not long ago.

Is Knowledge Power?

Do you think US citizens have the right to know if genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are in the foods they buy?

See results

S.764 also defines GMOs narrowly, "requiring" labels only for foods with ingredients "modified through in vitro recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) techniques" (qtd. in Lugo).

That means foods that contain oils and sweeteners made from genetically modifed crops would be exempt. But really, all genetically-modified food is exempt since no penalty is attached for non-compliance. In other words, S.764 is a fake measure no doubt meant to pacify consumers and make them think they're getting truth in labeling when in fact they are getting no such thing.

Furthermore, products labeled through QR codes only are inherently discriminatory, as they require smartphones or other readers the poor and elderly are unlikely to have.

According to the Rev. Jesse Jackson, "100,000,000 Americans, most of them poor, people of color and elderly either do not own a smart phone or an iPhone to scan the QR code or live in an area of poor internet connectivity."

"There are serious questions of discrimination presented here and unresolved matters of equal protection of the law," Jackson wrote in a letter to President Obama, urging him to "veto this bill and to send it back to Congress with instructions to correct this fatal flaw” (qtd. in "Rev. Jesse Jackson Calls on President Obama to Reject Discriminatory Labeling Bill").

Unfortunately, although the President commissioned a study regarding QR code accessibility, he did not reject the Act, but signed it into law on Friday, July 29, 2016.

Source

Thanks for Saving Me from Myself, Congress! NOT

Proponents of the law believe US consumers are just too ignorant and prejudiced against GMOs to be allowed to know what's actually in the foods they buy.

(I guess if they were wearing labels, two of their main ingredients would be elitism and paternalism.)

But really, aren't they just covering the asses of corporations like Monsanto and ConAgra? After all, if agribusiness had to worry about what consumers want, they might have to actually produce it— and make damn sure it's safe every time.

I want to know what I am eating. And, of course, I do not trust corporations to act in my best interest. Like many members of Congress, they have their own agendas, and my welfare is not one of them.

To me, accurate, real labeling is just another way to attempt to make them a little more careful, a little more accountable for the decisions that they make in their pursuit of profit.

Regardless of your opinion of GMOs, don't you think consumers have the right to know what's in their food?

For heaven's sake, even China labels GMOs.

According to the Center for Food Safety, 64 countries require food labeling that includes information regarding a product's GMO content.

Countries with hideous records on human rights, such as China and Saudi Arabia, require GMO labeling. But now, thanks to Congress and President Obama, the citizens of the United States are going to be left in the dark regarding the exact contents of their food in regard to GMOs.

Moreover, US citizens are going to think that they do know the GMO content of their food because while some companies will comply, others will ignore the penalty-free federal "requirements." And foods that actually do contain genetically modified organisms won't be labelled as such due to the law's narrow definition of GMO foods.

Is real GMO labeling too hot for Americans to handle?
Is real GMO labeling too hot for Americans to handle? | Source

President Obama's Response to Opponents of the Law

If you care about accurate food labeling and signed one or more petitions urging the President to veto the DARK Act, you'll be interested to know that, for the most part, he ignored you, signing it into law with only one proviso: "Before the new disclosure program [the DARK Act] is put in place, the law calls for a study to be conducted to assess whether challenges exist related to consumers' access to electronic disclosures." (See the email below.)

Yes, access to QR codes on packaging was a concern, but not the only one. Not even the primary one. The fact that the DARK Act is really a non-labeling law intended to hoodwink consumers regarding the content of their food is its primary flaw, and a study about consumer access to QR codes won't fix that.

Here's the full email response from the We the People Team at whitehouse.gov concerning the President's decision to sign the DARK Act into law:

"An update on labeling:

In recent years, Americans have expressed increased interest in understanding how their food is produced -- including whether it was produced using bioengineering (sometimes referred to as genetically modified organisms or GMOs).

This Administration is well aware of that interest, and we take it seriously.

As mentioned in this petition, earlier in July, both the Senate and the House passed a bill to require food manufacturers to disclose whether food includes ingredients that have been bioengineered. The legislation provides flexibility for companies to choose from the following options:

  • A text statement or symbol directly on the food packaging itself indicating bioengineered ingredients
  • A digital QR (Quick Response) code that customers can scan with their smartphone if they want to learn about bioengineered ingredients
  • Smaller companies could also offer a phone number or URL on the package that consumers can access for more info

Before the new disclosure program is put in place, the law calls for a study to be conducted to assess whether challenges exist related to consumers' access to electronic disclosures. If the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) determines that consumers would not have sufficient access to the information, the bill directs USDA to provide for alternative methods of disclosure. USDA will do everything possible to ensure that the program provides information in an equitable way.

Today, the President signed this legislation. While there is broad consensus that foods produced using bioengineering are safe, we appreciate the bipartisan effort to address consumers' interest in knowing more about their food, including whether it includes bioengineered ingredients. You can learn more about this legislation here or email questions to GMOlabeling@ams.usda.gov.

Through the USDA's National Organic Program, consumers can already identify food that was produced without any genetically engineered ingredients. Whenever you see the USDA Organic seal (seen here), it means that the food was grown without the use of prohibited pesticides, genetic engineering, synthetic fertilizers, or irradiation.

Your voice and input will be important throughout the implementation process of this legislation and in helping design the best disclosure program possible.

USDA has established a working group to develop a timeline for rulemaking and to ensure an open and transparent process for effectively establishing this new program. We are committed to providing multiple opportunities for engagement, such as listening sessions and the opportunity for the public to provide written comments. This process will ensure you have the opportunity to provide the Executive Branch with input on the attributes of the bioengineered food disclosure program as it is developed.

We look forward to your continuous engagement and will keep you posted here as these opportunities arise."

"I am disappointed the President signed the DARK Act into law. It is an unfair and disingenuous law."

— Angry US Consumer

The Message?

I guess the message is 1) "here's a panacea-- a study!" and 2) "if you really don't want to eat GMOs, buy food labelled organic."

We, US consumers, deserve a better response than this from our elected officials. We deserve to know what is in our food.

Unfortunately, that knowledge, that power, is being kept from us in the interests of agribusinesses. If our government speaks for them, who speaks for us?


Call the President! (Vent a little.)

It's easy to tell the President him you're upset that he signed the DARK Act into law.

Just call 202-456-1111 and stay on the line. An operator will take your message, so long as it's brief. Just say, "I'm disappointed President Obama failed to protect American consumers from the DARK Act, which is a sham and a disgrace." Or something to that effect.

I called this afternoon, and it took about five minutes, from dialing the number to ending the call.

Please join me in expressing disdain, anger and outrage at this ridiculous non-labeling GMO law that shields agribusiness and blinds consumers from the truth about what's in their food.

Questions & Answers

    Comments

      0 of 8192 characters used
      Post Comment

      • The Dirt Farmer profile imageAUTHOR

        Jill Spencer 

        2 years ago from United States

        Deb, thanks for your comment. Yes, let's keep buying local and organic when we can, and work to make safe food available to people at every rung of the economic ladder.

      • The Dirt Farmer profile imageAUTHOR

        Jill Spencer 

        2 years ago from United States

        Hi Patricia, sorry it's taken me so long to release your comment. I didn't get a notice you had written. Hopefully the bugs in the program will be resolved soon. I agree with you totally. It's been through the fear of terrorism that so many of our civil rights have been taken away, first under Bush and even more under Obama. We need to be vigilant regarding our freedoms via the internet, especially since this election cycle shows how third party candidates can skirt the more controlled media outlets and gain popularity through social media and alternative news outlets on the web. Thanks for sharing the article! All the best to you and your family, Jill

      • profile image

        Deb Hirt 

        2 years ago

        With Big Business running this country, the President is now a token figure to do their bidding. We either have to buy organic or grow our own using organic seeds. After all, the other option is not good, for it will eventually kill us.

      • The Dirt Farmer profile imageAUTHOR

        Jill Spencer 

        2 years ago from United States

        Thanks for your comment, Cynthia. Pesticide and herbicide free would both be wonderful, and result (I believe) in a healthier, more balanced ecosystem. Buy local! Buy organic!

      • profile image

        Cynthia Haltom 

        2 years ago

        Gmo's are a crime against humanity. Food must return to it's natural state to protect the health and safety of the public. I would also like to see pesticides removed from our food system The only way to fight this is to only buy organically grown food, it is a vote for organic farming.

      • The Dirt Farmer profile imageAUTHOR

        Jill Spencer 

        2 years ago from United States

        Awesome, MsDora! Spread the word. Let's hope President Obama is listening.

      • MsDora profile image

        Dora Weithers 

        2 years ago from The Caribbean

        Thanks for this very informative article, and for posting the number to call. It's the least we all can do, and I'm calling from here on a US line.

      • profile image

        pstraubie48 

        2 years ago

        This is so important. It is scary what we don't know!!! It never fails to amaze me how we are denied access to. Don't get me wrong... I LOVE this country...but that does not mean that there are not things that need to be fixed. Those in DC and in other areas of government have become loose cannons and have relinquished OUR freedoms to high powered agencies and businesses that pressure them to act and do as they do

        Sorry, I got off topic.

        Thanks for sharing...we need to have our eyes open and our voices loud. Angels are on the way to you and hopefully carrying your message far and wide. ps sharing

      • The Dirt Farmer profile imageAUTHOR

        Jill Spencer 

        2 years ago from United States

        Thank you so much for sharing this, Faith Reaper! I hope that you and your followers will let President Obama know consumers want fair and accurate labeling of foods that contain GMOs. All the best, Jill

      • Faith Reaper profile image

        Faith Reaper 

        2 years ago from southern USA

        Oh, my goodness, how disturbing! Thank you for bringing this craziness to our attention ...what can they be thinking, for we have a right to know what we are eating.

        This is scary beyond belief. Sharing everywhere to get the word out.

        Bless you

      • The Dirt Farmer profile imageAUTHOR

        Jill Spencer 

        2 years ago from United States

        Thank you for reading, vespawoolf. I'm hoping the President will use his veto power.

      • vespawoolf profile image

        vespawoolf 

        2 years ago from Peru, South America

        I was also very disappointed about this legislation. Hopefully the public will unite against such dangerous laws. Thank you for this informative information.

      • The Dirt Farmer profile imageAUTHOR

        Jill Spencer 

        2 years ago from United States

        Thanks for dropping by, Gypzeerose and Larry Rankin. The lack of true transparency of the bill and its lenient (and potentially discriminatory) options for manufacturers makes it a real slap in the face to the American public. Hope you'll protest it through a phone call or by signing the petition.

      • Larry Rankin profile image

        Larry Rankin 

        2 years ago from Oklahoma

        Very disturbing and important message.

      • Gypzeerose profile image

        Rose Jones 

        2 years ago

        This is disgusting. I hope that more people speaking up will help us get rid of GMO's eventually, but it will be a struggle that is for sure.

      • The Dirt Farmer profile imageAUTHOR

        Jill Spencer 

        2 years ago from United States

        Thank you, Audrey, for passing it on!

      • vocalcoach profile image

        Audrey Hunt 

        2 years ago from Idyllwild Ca.

        This is terrible! We have a right to know what's in our food!!! Posting this hub on my FB timeline and sending it to my family and friends. Urging as many people as I can top call the number you've listed here.

        Thanks!

        Audrey

      working

      This website uses cookies

      As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, soapboxie.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

      For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://soapboxie.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

      Show Details
      Necessary
      HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
      LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
      Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
      AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
      Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
      CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
      Features
      Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
      Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
      Marketing
      Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
      Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
      Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
      Statistics
      Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
      ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)