Skip to main content

Facebook Live: Friend or Foe?

As one of Facebook's original users, Camille has seen its evolution. She currently abstains from it, but keeps abreast of its developments.

Do the cons of Facebook Live outweigh the pros?

Do the cons of Facebook Live outweigh the pros?

Does Facebook Live Kill People?

By the time you read this, there's a good chance that yet another death has been broadcast live on Facebook. Of these deaths, Mark Zuckerberg—the 21st century's most famous Wunderkind—will probably say that Facebook is doing everything it can to prevent these kinds of tragedies in the future. He said just that at Facebook's April 2017 conference:

"We have a lot of work and we will keep doing all we can to prevent tragedies like this from happening."

The point of Facebook Live, according to Zuckerberg—and, by extension, Facebook—is a "raw, emotional, visceral way to share and connect..." Watching people suffering breakdowns and murdering people LIVE is certainly emotional and visceral, but is it good for society? Is Facebook Live a friend or a foe?

Pros and Cons of Facebook Live

Let's take a look at the advantages and drawbacks of this live-streaming service.


  • Free to use: Facebook is—and has always been—free to use. The platform began experimenting with ads in the form of "sponsored stories" in early 2012. Users currently see ads embedded in their "feeds". Advertising comprises most of the company's revenue. The ad-supported model works, and the company appears to have no plans to charge.
  • Easy to use: Starting a live feed takes three simple steps. Presumably, anyone who can post on Facebook can start a live video from either their computer or phone.
  • Helps people connect: With more than 3 billion users (roughly half of Earth's population), Facebook is the largest social network in the world. If you want to connect with the greatest number of people possible, Facebook is probably the cheapest and most effective way to do it.
Facebook Live is free and easy to use, but it has led to violent content.

Facebook Live is free and easy to use, but it has led to violent content.


Examples of Facebook Live Deaths

(Sadly, this is not a comprehensive list.)

  • August 24, 2017: An unidentified man in Mashpee, MA hung himself.
  • June 19, 2017:
    "Aspiring YouTube star" Pedro Ruiz was shot in the chest by his girlfriend. His death is believed to be accidental.
  • May 13, 2017:
    A 33-year-old musician set himself on fire in front of his ex-girlfriend's bar. He "broadcast the moment he set himself alight".
  • April 26, 2017: An Alabama man live-streamed his suicide.
  • April 25, 2017: An 11-month-old baby was killed by her 20-year-old father in Thailand. He then killed himself.
  • April 16, 2017: A 74-year-old man was killed by a stranger who live-streamed it.
  • January 25, 2017: A 14-year-old girl from Miami live-streamed her suicide.
  • January 23, 2017: An aspiring actor died after shooting himself.
  • October 11, 2016: A young Turkish man committed suicide after expressing his devastation over a breakup.
Concerns over live-streaming existed even back in 2008 with

Concerns over live-streaming existed even back in 2008 with

Was the Writing on the Wall With

In a now prescient article from 2008, author Liz Gannes reported on the death of 19-year-old Abraham Biggs. Abraham, aka CandyJunkie, committed suicide by ingesting pills. He did so live on Gannes asks, "...what could sites like possibly do to prevent live-streamed snuff films?"

Despite nearly a decade of innovation (and hopefully research), preventative measures are few and far between. Live stream technology—and social media in general—has the power to connect us. It also has the power to harm us, starting with the most vulnerable and impressionable of our society: our children.

This content reflects the personal opinions of the author. It is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and should not be substituted for impartial fact or advice in legal, political, or personal matters.