report

Civil Rights in the Eisenhower and Kennedy Presidencies

Source

Striving for Equal Rights

Since the early history of the United State of America, discrimination of foreigners has been a main component. While many people were busy forgetting that American citizens were the original foreigners invading the land of indigenous peoples, they were also doing anything and everything to deny basic human rights to minorities like African-Americans. From personal freedom, voting rights, and full citizenship, African-Americans in the United States were constantly trying to catch up with the rest of the nation. As the Civil War was looming, tensions grew over the issue of slavery. After the abolishment of slavery by President Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War it was believed that the rights of African-Americans were going to greatly improve. However, it took decades before full rights would be extended to African-Americans through the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The journey of full rights for African-Americans was a long and hard road. Many people suffered, were seriously injured, and even died in their fight for full rights.

Throughout the fight for African-American rights there were many important events. From trials at all court levels, to boycotts, as well as demonstrations and marches African-Americans and even whites stuck together to make it clear that change was coming, whether the United States liked it or not. Some key events were the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, Montgomery bus boycott, the incident of Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the March on Washington. Before President D. Eisenhower went into office, there had been a few key moments in the history of African-American rights. First the separate-but-equal doctrine that had been confirmed through the Plessy case of 1896 allowed for inequality in the way people were treated in all areas of life based on factors such as race. In the 1930’s however, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) sought to improve the lives of African-Americans through targeting higher education. Though it took some years, in 1950 the case of Sweatt v. Painter determined that black law schools and white law schools in Texas were not of an equal quality. The state was then required to fix this problem, which was a big step towards equality in education for African-American citizens of the United States. Before this case however, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued executive order 8802 to begin the Fair Employment Practices Commission which removed race discrimination from hiring and employment opportunities. In 1948, President Truman issued another executive order, 9981, removing segregation from the armed forces. Each of these events played a part in the lead up to what we know today as the Civil Rights movement.

Source

The Eisenhower Years

President Dwight D. Eisenhower was elected for his first term in 1952, and for his second in 1956. During him second term, the Civil Rights movement began to boil. A very important starting point in the Civil Rights movement was the decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. The courts declared in this case that in public education, “separate-but-equal has no place…separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." With this, the NAACP was making even further strides in their goals for equal educational opportunities. In 1957, when black students tried to attend a previously all white school in Little Rock, Arkansas, the governor sent out the National Guard to stop them. Upon hearing the news, Eisenhower sent 1000 paratroopers to escort the African-American students and to keep them safe. In reaction, the governor Faubus closed schools for the academic school year of 1958-1959. In the years 1955 to 1957 there was a bus boycott started in reaction to Rosa Parks arrest for refusing to give up her seat on a bus to a white man. This came to be known as the Montgomery Bus Boycott.

Source

The Kennedy Years

During Kennedy’s presidency there were also some major events of the Civil Rights Movement. Kennedy was elected president in the election of 1960. In 1961 people came together to ride buses down south and protest segregation and inequality of African-American citizens. This came to be known as the Freedom Riders. In 1962, President Kennedy assisted an African-American student, James Meredith, in going to the University of Mississippi to enroll in classes. Martin Luther King Junior, a very important member of the Civil Rights movement, had always supported nonviolent protest of the inequality of African-Americans. However, in Birmingham, Alabama, King realized that his protests could provoke violence from others, and therefore provide a clear view for the rest of the nation just how violent people were towards African-Americans. President Kennedy forced Alabama governor, Wallace, to allow the enrollment of black students in white schools after the governor promised “segregation today, tomorrow, and forever,” in 1963. That same year however, President Kennedy was assassinated.

Evaluating the Presidencies and the Civil Rights Movement

When considering the actions of presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy, it seems that they had an equal part to play in supporting the Civil Rights movement. This isn’t completely true though. During Eisenhower’s presidency, he did strongly support civil rights for all. And during his second term he certainly did what he could to support that. Kennedy on the other hand was more hesitant on the issue. In reality, it was because of his brother, Robert, that President Kennedy supported civil rights as much as he did. Most of his actions were at the advisement and pleas of Robert Kennedy. While this doesn’t mean that he wasn’t supportive of equal rights for African-Americans, it does help show how differently each president approached the issue.

The United States took a hard road towards equal rights. While the times were rough and fighting ensued, people continued to stick through and fight for their rights. People like Martin Luther King Junior became key figures in this battle of rights and inspired all kinds of people, black and white and otherwise to come together for a great good. Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy both gave their support to the Civil Rights movement, but not for the same reasons. Robert Kennedy was the real power behind President Kennedy’s support of civil rights. In 1964, though after the assassination of President Kennedy, we saw the passage of the Civil Rights Act, supported strongly by President Lyndon Johnson. Though the Civil Rights Act wasn’t the complete end of the African-American’s movement, it outlawed discrimination and segregation and guaranteed equal employment opportunities. These laws weren’t only geared towards African-Americans though, they supported all people of any race or ethnicity. Without the Civil Rights movement, we may have still been experiencing great inequality today for many people.

THIS ARTICLE IS THE WORK OF MYSELF, ALYSSA BARRON, AND WAS COMPLETED PREVIOUSLY AS A CLASS ASSIGNMENT. I AM PUBLISHING IT HERE BECAUSE I FEEL THAT IT MAKES A GOOD AND INFORMATIVE ARTICLE AND HAS INFORMATION THAT OTHERS SHOULD BE INTERESTED IN AND ABLE TO LEARN FROM.

Comments 5 comments

HSchneider 3 years ago from Parsippany, New Jersey

Very well written and informative, Alyssa. The groundwork laid during these years in Civil Rights made the 1964 and 1965 Civil Rights and Voting Rights laws possible


lions44 profile image

lions44 3 years ago from Auburn, WA

Great job on the article. Good to see young people writing about history. Ike's contribution to Civil Rights has been long overlooked, even though in many case his hand was forced. His VP Richard Nixon deserves a lot of the credit by working behind the scenes with the Senate.


S Leretseh profile image

S Leretseh 2 years ago

QUOTE:: "They [white Christian males] were also doing anything and everything to deny basic human rights to minorities like African-Americans. "

This is a tremendous distortion of the truth. Alyssa, your whole article is simply loaded with clichés and platitudes. Why -HOW(!) - could you write such a thing? With all the vast resources available to you to do due diligence research on the GREAT American history, and the construct of human history, why are you are still willing to cling to the lies of the liberals? Being a female, perhaps you don't understand historically how and why societies formed. They are - all of them in human history - created my male groups (males racially, linguistically, religiously similar). The society exists to provide a social stratification system ONLY for that male group that created the society. White Christian males were not doing anything historically wrong by requiring black males to create their own status environments i.e. their own living arrangements. The structure of American society changed with the compulsory integration act of 1964. Compulsory integration laws are in fact...White Christian males gifting the black race the most magnanimous gesture from one people toward another in human history. What blacks received was "integration" rights, not "human" rights or "equal" rights. No male group had ever in human history OWED another people integration rights into THEIR status environments.

Blacks were supposed to be separate ...so as a "group" they could achieve self-reliance i.e. create their own distinct culture and create their own status environments. White people WERE NOT wronging the black race with a color line! The racial violence that has EXPLODED across America since 1964 with blacks attacking white people, not doubt in my mind, it's rooted in the way white people interpret the creation of compulsory integration - again, the most magnanimous gesture from one people toward another in human history. The way you write this article ALYSSA is in fact inciting one people against another. I encourage you to look beyond liberal academia's interpretation - the trashing - of American history.


alyssabarron profile image

alyssabarron 2 years ago from Illinois Author

In fact, your own comment on this article is where you will find inciting language against others. Your extreme closed mindedness is why the people who were being oppressed then would have never been able to, as you put it, "create their own status environments i.e. their own living arrangements."

In addition to this extreme assumption of yours, which is not in fact based on actual history or the ways in which civilizations have been formed in the past, you are claiming that only males are allowed to be protected by the 'groups' that they make. Hunter-gathers, before the creation of agricultural civilizations , based their society on Egalitarian Values in which men and women were equal and made important decisions together for their nomadic society.

I would highly recommend you first do your own research before trying to make such grand and sweeping assumptions about things that you have no knowledge of.


alyssabarron profile image

alyssabarron 2 years ago from Illinois Author

I would also like to point out that your quote is completely misused. "They" does not refer specifically to white Christian males. It refers to all people participating in the extreme injustice of denying an entire race of people their due rights in the United States of America as citizens of this country. I in fact did not use the words "christian" or "religion" or "religious" or any other variation thereof in this entire article. Again, your assumptions are absolutely over the top and ridiculous. And any person who legitimately reads this article could see that you have no idea what you are even commenting on.

If you are going to quote someone then you should actual quote them, not reinterpret their quote to say what you want just to incite others against the original author.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article

    Menu

    Resources