The Two Types of Offender Profiling

Updated on July 22, 2019
Angel Harper profile image

Angel is currently studying for her A-levels (English, Sociology and Psychology) in the hopes to go to university next year.

Source

Although offender profiling is less glamorous than Sherlock Homes suggests, it can be an extremely useful tool for the police, as it allows potential suspects to be selected with more ease and narrows down potential criminals. One type of offender profiling is the 'top-down approach'. This is heavily used in the US and originates from the FBI. This approach "starts with the big picture and then fills in the details" (Deb Gajic 2017). In contrast, the 'bottom-up approach' is a British method which involves a more scientific and data-reliant technique where crime statistics are used to make predictions of likely suspects.

The Bottom-Up Approach

David Canter first suggested that offender profiling should be founded on psychological research and developed a three-item offender profiling process:

1. Interpersonal Coherence: This is the idea that people's behaviour is consistent, so their crimes will contain indicators of their everyday lives.

2. Forensic Awareness: Canter suggested that the way a crime is conducted may indicate whether the offender has committed previous crimes. For instance, Davis et al discovered that rapists who removed their fingerprints from a crime scene had previous convictions for burglary.

3. Smallest Space Analysis: Statistics reveal the relationship between certain types of crime and certain types of people and their behaviours. These 'types' are categorised into three groups:

  • Instrumental opportunistic: When an offender uses the easiest method to obtain something.
  • Instrumental cognitive: When a crime was thought through and planned.
  • Expressive impulsive: Crimes heavily influenced by impulse and strong emotions.

Canter also advocated for geographical profiling in which the locations of crimes can reveal the neighbourhood the offender lives in or where they work. Kim Rossmo developed the Criminal Geographic Targeting system, which creates a digital map displaying the likelihood of the offender's closeness to the scene of the crime.

Source

Limitations of the Bottom-Up Approach

Although this method is scientific, it is also subject to bias. This is because all the data which is used to make the profiles is based on criminals who have been caught, so it cannot provide predictions or insight into the types of criminals who remain undetected. Not all crime shows in statistics, which means there is a 'dark figure' of crime. Essentially, this type of profiling doesn't accurately represent the extent of crime, and the offenders who avoid conviction which could potentially send the police searching for the wrong suspects.

Furthermore, Copson discovered that only 3% of police officers found the advice provided by this technique actually useful in locating and convicting the true offender. In fact, the majority of officers do not use bottom-up offender profiling in their cases. This may be due to its time- and money-consuming nature or simply because it is not effective.

Despite Rossmo's continuing support for geographical profiling, his Criminal Geographic Targeting system is no longer used as the police claimed the method did not improve efficiency in offender profiling.

Source

The Top-Down Approach

This method is based more on intuition than statistics, so it is criticised for being unscientific. The approach relies on six elements:

1. Profiling Inputs: This is when data from the crime scene is collected such as a description of the crime, details about the victim and their family and the cause of death.

2. Decision Process Models: Factors such as the time and location are taken into account, the profiler may also decide whether the murder was a stand-alone or part of a series of killings.

3. Crime Assessment: The previous information is then used to decide if the offender is organised (planned) or disorganised (unplanned and random).

4. Criminal Profile: A general description of the potential offender is created, which can then be used by the police to narrow down suspects

5. Crime Assessment: If new information is discovered or police are unable to find any leads, the whole process may have to start again from the beginning.

6. Apprehension: The reliability of validity of the overall process is assessed once the offender is apprehended.

Source

Limitations of the Top-Down Approach

The organised/disorganised distinction is largely criticised because the concepts originated from research on the most dangerous and violent criminals such as Ted Bundy. Not only are criminals unreliable sources of information but the data collected doesn't represent the majority of crimes. Ted Bundy and others like him are only a very small percentage so don't necessarily mirror the 'regular' criminal mind and behaviour.

Also, Turvey notes that the 'organised' and 'disorganised' labels are not distinct categories so may overlap, Douglas suggests including a third 'mixed' group but this would defeat the original purpose of the labels in the first place.

Snook et al criticised the top-down approach for being a 'junk science' which lacks any scientific basis. They suggest that any claims that the profiling is accurate are simply due to the Barnum effect, in which the descriptions are so vague and generalised that they could apply to almost anyone (as with psychic readings and horoscopes).

Another limitation is that intelligent criminals could use this approach to throw off the investigators. For instance, if they commit crimes which seem impulsive and random, then the police may search for someone who is emotional and impulsive rather than someone who is intelligent and calculating.

Which Technique Is Better?

The bottom-up approach relies on statistical data and geographical profiling to create an offender profile; despite being scientific it can also be biased.

The top-down approach is based on intuition and so it is criticised for not being scientific.

Overall, both techniques could be effective at narrowing down potential suspects. However, neither technique has been perfected yet, which is why they are disregarded in criminal investigations.

Which Approach Do You Prefer?

See results

References

Cardwell, M., Flanagan,C. (2016) Psychology A level Year 2 The Complete Companion Student Book fourth edition. Published by Oxford University Press, United Kingdom

Gajic, D. (2017) Forensic Psychology A level Revision Notes. Published on Simply Psychology available at https://www.simplypsychology.org/a-level-forensic.html

Questions & Answers

    © 2019 Angel Harper

    Comments

      0 of 8192 characters used
      Post Comment
      • NessMovieReviews profile image

        Mother of Movies and Series Reviews 

        5 weeks ago from Moreton Bay, Queensland

        Very interesting article. Thanks for writing it!

      working

      This website uses cookies

      As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, soapboxie.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

      For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://soapboxie.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

      Show Details
      Necessary
      HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
      LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
      Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
      AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
      Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
      CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
      Features
      Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
      Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
      Marketing
      Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
      Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
      Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
      Statistics
      Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
      ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
      ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)