The author is a QUB Pol Sci Honours graduate and has written extensively on imperialism, national liberation struggles and class issues.
What Are MAPs?
Do you ever encounter the terms 'MAP' or 'AOA' on Twitter or other social media while browsing? These harmless-sounding acronyms are in fact codes used by paedophiles to identify themselves online. 'AOA' stands for 'Age Of Attraction' and 'MAP' means 'Minor Attracted Person'. They were always a presence within the nadirs of Twitter, but paedophiles migrated en masse when Tumblr decided to ban all nudity and 'adult' content from its platform some months ago.
It is quite clear that a significant number of paedophiles and their collaborators on social media are cohesively engaged in a scripted PR campaign to normalize child abuse. Their number one goal—and it's an old one from at least the PIE (Pedophile Information Exchange) days—is to see child abuse made so acceptable that 'P' for paedophilia is added to the gay movements' LBGT acronym ie 'LBGTP'. PIE was actually an affiliate member of the National Council for Civil Liberties* (now Liberty). This is an appalling vista for any decent person to contemplate. It is a sick and factually criminal attempt to dress what most see as the most heinous of crimes being portrayed as an acceptable lifestyle or legal sexual preference.
Despite their slick social media campaign's attempt to portray us all as somehow 'bigots' for opposing child sexual abuse, some of these deviants list their 'AOA' (Age of attraction) as five years old and even younger! Even worse, many of those who challenge them on social media have had their accounts either partially or permanently banned from the platform.
It should be noted that in late February 2014, Shami Chakrabarti, the director of Liberty (formerly Britain's National Council for Civil Liberties), wrote an official apology for the organization's very public previous links between the then NCCL, as Liberty was formerly called, and PIE. Chakrabarti stated:
"It is a source of continuing disgust and horror that even the NCCL had to expel paedophiles from its ranks in 1983 after infiltration at some point in the seventies."
Unfortunately, due to paedophilia advocates like Tatchell and Cantor, Twitter changed its policy stating,
“discussions related to child exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction to minors are permitted, provided they don’t glorify CSE in any way.”
The thin end of the wedge, you may think, and you'd be right. The PIE Hydra now uses terms like MAP, AOA, NOMAP etc. in its rejuvenation, and it's an online campaign on social media platforms to attempt to make the abuse of children acceptable. The first measure in resisting these child abusers and their advocates is awareness. Hopefully, this article may go some way in doing so. I plan to publish another article taking a closer look at the advocates for the legalisation of paedophilia, and some of those are household names!
British MPs Confronted Over Links to Paedophillia Advocacy Groups
Some of the prominent British politicians, MPs, political lobbyists and even Cabinet Ministers involved in child abuse advocacy—often via PIE (Pedophile Information Exchange), which actually received government funding for three years—included:
- Cyril Smith
- Harriet Harman
- Patricia Hewitt
- Patrick Rock
- Peter Morrison
- Lord Greville Janner
- Phillip Lyon
- Stephen Carnell
- Lord Justice Fulford
- Sir Peter Hayman
- Jack Dromey
- Sir Peter Telford Hayman
- Tom O'Carroll
- Keith Hose
- Steven Smith
- Warren Middleton
- Peter Tatchell
An example of the brazenly open level this child abuse advocacy group used to have can be seen in a communique sent to all British MPs:
“Paedophiles are ordinary, decent, sensible human beings, no more sexually depraved than yourself, and with a capacity for loving and helping children which is at present being repressed.”
Dr. Jacqui Dillon: Survivor and Advocate Against Child Exploitation
Dr. Jacqui Dillon1 is a hero to those traumatized by child exploitation. She is also a highly esteemed political activist, author, and orator, and has taught and published globally on abuse trauma, dissociation, psychosis, and recovery. Dr. Jacqui is the current head of the Hearing Voices Network in England, Visiting Research Fellow at The Centre for Community Mental Health, Birmingham City University and Hon Lecturer in Clinical Psychology at the University of Eastern London.
Jacqui is a member of St. Catherine’s College, Oxford University's Advisory Board. Jacqui has published multiple articles and papers, co-edited 3 major books and has a seat on the editorial board of the journal Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches. In short, Dr. Jacqui is the expert on the modus operandi of child abusers online and how they use the 'MAP' nomenclature online to continue their exploitation of children online, in plain sight.
Shockingly, in a recent interview, London-based Dr. Jacqui Dillon, an expert in the trauma caused by child sexual abuse and a survivor of child abuse herself, stated:
"The current attempts to legitimise paedophilia have become apparent on Twitter, with a growing number of people describing themselves as “Maps,” an acronym for “minor-attracted person,” a term used by individuals who are sexually attracted to those below the age of consent, including: neophilia or infantophilia (attraction to babies and toddlers); paedophilia (attraction to pre-pubescent children); hebephilia (attraction to pubescent children/early adolescents); and ephebophilia (attraction to late adolescents)."
If that were not bad enough, when Dr. Jacqui challenged these paedophiles online, she was subjected to mass-reporting, doxing, rape threats and constant harassment. Despite reporting these abuses to Twitter, it was she who found her account permanently suspended by the social media giant. Dr. Jacqui only regained her Twitter account when her colleagues lobbied the vice-president of Twitter Europe.
According to Twitter, paedophiles are permitted to use their platform as long as they do not discuss the crimes against children they have committed or intend to commit! Dr. Jacqui has pointed out the devious nature of these pedophiles, the long term planning they habitually engage in and efforts they go to, to appear plausible and even contrite. Yet underneath these MAPs' supposedly contrite online personas, child abuse trauma experts like Dr. Jacqui can get glimpses of the MAPs' real records through statutory legislation:
"I have been sent evidence that some of the most vociferous “Maps” have committed extremely serious crimes against children and are currently grooming children."
This is extremely worrying for parents and those who care about the welfare of children. Let's not forget that children can officially register as Twitter users at only thirteen years of age and many even younger children find ways to circumvent the official age limit. Paedophiles using the cover name of a MAP are active on all social media platforms, not just Twitter.
1. For more details about Dr. Jacqui Dillon’s work, visit jacquidillon.org.
In the immortal words of Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, what is to be done? Firstly, the ball is firmly in Twitter and other social media platforms' court. The paedophiles' chief advocate within academia spells it out himself, i.e., the normalization of the abuse of little children and babies, to the extent that 'P' for paedophilia is decriminalized in the USA and Europe so it is added to the LBGT acronym. 'Over my dead body', I hear you say, and there are not just millions in agreement with you. There are literally billions against these creeps!
If you have children, grandchildren, or young siblings who use the internet, which is factually almost 100% of kids in the global north, make them aware of the MAP acronym and other codified language paedophiles use online, such as 'AOA' (Age of Attraction). Let social media giants like Twitter know how you feel about their part in the push to make paedophilia somehow acceptable. Be careful about challenging these MAP perverts online; they are part of a funded PR campaign with one 'controller' able to direct several profiles, so that it may falsely seem to you that you are in a minority. As mentioned earlier, you are very much in the majority with billions of people agreeing with you. One of the prime MAP tactics is to attach themselves to liberal, progressive or libertarian causes online, then gradually introduce their twisted and illegal intentions into the agenda.
As stated earlier, my forthcoming article will shine a closer spotlight on the key figures who are actively lobbying to legalise the abuse of little children, from the ivory towers of academia to the padded benches of legislatures to the entertainment industry.
This content reflects the personal opinions of the author. It is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and should not be substituted for impartial fact or advice in legal, political, or personal matters.
© 2019 Liam A Ryan
Liam A Ryan (author) from Ireland on October 14, 2019:
Ken Burgess from Florida on October 08, 2019:
"It is quite clear that a significant number of paedophiles and their collaborators on social media are cohesively engaged in a scripted PR campaign to normalize child abuse. Their number one goal, and it's an old one from at least the PIE (Pedophile Information Exchange) days, is to see child abuse made so acceptable that 'P' for paedophilia is added to the gay movements' LBGT acronym ie 'LBGTP'."
It is a shame our country has devolved to the point where they can openly advocate for this, and not be arrested, imprisoned, and permanently labeled as a felon & sex predator.
We waste billions arresting and incarcerating people who smoke weed, or grow a couple pot plants in their yard... but let people like this communicate freely in public and prey on our children. Sad really.
Liam A Ryan (author) from Ireland on October 05, 2019:
Thank you Lorna for your kind comments. Yes, you are right, more people must be made aware of this attempt to legalise child abuse.
Please feel free to share part or all of my article anywhere you wish online.
Lorna Lamon on October 05, 2019:
Thank you for drawing attention to this blatant disregard for children's lives. I am incensed that social media platforms are hosting these vile excuses for human beings. Innocent children have to be protected above everything else and I fail to understand the mentality of anyone who cannot see this. As a Psychologist I have heard many things which have both saddened and shocked me, this infuriates me. It's so important that people do not become immune to the dangers lurking on-line as it's only with knowledge we have the power to stop it. Innocent children do not have a voice and that is why they need to be protected. Your article hit home Liam and I will certainly drawn attention to it.