Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Provides Attorneys With More Document Review Work

Updated on July 25, 2017

No Escape for International Corporations

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is likely to provide more work for translators and document review attorneys during the new presidential administration.

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said during a speech shortly after taking office in 2017 that the Justice Department would continue to prosecute corporate fraud. He added that one area where this is critical is enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The Act is a 1977 federal law designed to enforce transparency in corporate reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission and to combat bribery of foreign officials.

It has provided a growing source of document reviews sometimes ordered by judges before major trials in recent years.

The reviews typically consist of assigning attorneys to read emails, contracts, financial statements and other internal documents of an organization and to flag any information hinting at criminal or civil wrongdoing using specialized software.

Sessions said the Justice Department would look favorably on corporations that comply with government regulations, cooperate during investigations, disclose any deviations from compliance and try to resolve problems.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is the primary legislation the Justice Department uses as the standard to determine an international corporation’s compliance. The document reviews often use attorneys who speak foreign languages.

Recent FCPA and Justice Department Events

One of the Justice Department’s largest recent document reviews of international business followed an April 2012 New York Times report saying a former executive of Walmart de Mexico y Centroamerica was alleging use of bribery by company officials.

He said Walmart de Mexico officials bribed government officials to obtain construction permits for their retail outlets. He also said the bribes became known to U.S. Walmart executives after an internal investigation but that they “hushed up” the allegations.

A follow-up report by Bloomberg News said the probe of possible bribery in Mexico may prompt executive departures and steep U.S. government fines if it reveals senior managers knew about the payments and didn't take strong enough action, corporate governance experts said.

Since then, Walmart and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have lobbied Congress to amend the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. They said the law needed to be clarified but their critics accused them of trying to weaken the law.

Other international business investigations, sometimes including document review, have focused on major corporations such as Monsanto, Halliburton, Lucent Technologies and Daimler AG.

What is the FCPA?

The scope of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is broad, covering the business activities of nearly anyone associated with the United States who engages in international trade.

Some of the people prosecuted under the Act were not physically present in the United States when they allegedly committed the wrongful behavior. Others were not American citizens.

An ongoing controversy with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is whether it discourages foreign investment in the United States.

Critics say that payments considered illegal under U.S. law are considered fringe benefits by corporate executives in some countries. As a result, they might be discouraged from doing business in the United States if they believe they could face increased liability.

Examples include international companies that engage in mergers and acquisitions in emerging foreign markets where corruption levels are high.

Part of the political motivation for the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act resulted from a mid-1970s Securities and Exchange Commission investigation. It found that more than 400 U.S. companies admitted to making payments totaling more than $300 million to foreign government officials or political parties to advance their business interests.

They included direct bribes for high-ranking foreign officials to facilitating payments to ensure lower-level ministers or clerks carry out their duties.

One of the Justice Department prosecutions fell on Lockheed Martin Corp. after the aerospace giant’s executives paid foreign officials to show favoritism toward the company’s products.

Another prosecution, known as Bananagate, was against Chiquita Brands after the company bribed the president of Honduras to lower the taxes it paid.

Congress amended the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in 1988 with the knowing standard. In other words, the Justice Department must prove anyone prosecuted under the Act either knew they were doing something wrong, engaged in “conscious disregard” of the law or willful blindness.

The most controversial change was the 1998 amendment, in which Congress extended the scope of the law beyond U.S. borders and authorized prosecutions of foreign citizens.

How Recent FCPA Events Lead to More Document Review

Foreign governments and business owners complained that the U.S. government might intrude into their domestic affairs with such a broad authorization. They also worried that the sometimes enormous fines could seriously hurt their international trade.

In 2008, Siemens AG paid a $450 million fine after being prosecuted for a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violation. It is one of the largest fines in the history of the federal law.

In 2012, the Japanese firm Marubeni Corp. paid a $54.6 million fine for allegedly acting as the agent of an international joint venture that won four Nigerian government contracts worth more than $6 billion. The joint venture won the contracts after paying Marubeni Corp. $51 million to bribe Nigerian government officials.

In 2014, ALCOA was forced to relinquish $175 in revenue and fined $209 million after its Australian mining subsidiary hired an agent to bribe officials in Bahrain to win a bauxite ore supply contract.

Why is Document Review Important

The Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission investigations required significant reviews of communications and financial documents.

Based on previous successes with document reviews, federal courts have been ordering them during investigations at an increasing rate.

No Escape for International Corporate Fraud

No Escape for International Corporate Fraud
No Escape for International Corporate Fraud

This content reflects the personal opinions of the author. It is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and should not be substituted for impartial fact or advice in legal, political, or personal matters.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)